All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
	Kevin Willford <kewillf@microsoft.com>,
	Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] diff_flush_patch_id: stop returning error result
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:58:25 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609091455180.129229@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160909104007.pwki2ir6et3vvk55@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Hi Peff,

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Jeff King wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > I like the simplification, but I *hate* the fact that the calling code has
> > *no way* to inform the user about the proper next steps.
> > 
> > You are touching code that is really quite at the bottom of a lot of call
> > chains. For example in the one of `git pull --rebase`. I just spent an
> > insane amount of time trying to make sure that this command will not
> > simply die() somewhere deep in the code, leaving the user puzzled.
> > 
> > Please see 3be18b4 (t5520: verify that `pull --rebase` shows the helpful
> > advice when failing, 2016-07-26) for more details.
> 
> Yes, I agree that this is the opposite direction of libification. And I
> agree that the current message is not very helpful.
> 
> But I am not sure that returning the error up the stack will actually
> help somebody move forward. The reason these are all die() calls in the
> rest of the diff code is that they are generally indicative of
> unrecoverable repository corruption. So any advice does not really
> depend on what operation you are performing; it is always "stop what you
> are doing immediately, run fsck, and try to get the broken objects from
> somebody else".
> 
> So IMHO, on balance this is not hurting anything.

Well, you make such a situation even worse than it already is.

It would be one thing to change the code to actually say "stop what you
are doing immediately, run `git fsck` and try to get the broken objects
from somewhere else", *before* saying how to proceed after that.

But that is not what your patch does.

What your patch does is to remove *even the possibility* of saying how to
proceed after getting the repository corruption fixed. And instead of
saying how the corruption could be fixed, it outputs a terse "cannot read
files to diff".

I do not think that is a wise direction.

Ciao,
Dscho

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-09 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-07  7:53 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] more patch-id speedups Jeff King
2016-09-07  7:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] patch-ids: turn off rename detection Jeff King
2016-09-07 12:53   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-07  7:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] patch-ids: skip merge commits Jeff King
2016-09-07 12:52   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-07 18:46     ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:08       ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 13:06 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] more patch-id speedups Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-07 18:49   ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:01 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 0/3] patch-id for merges Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:02   ` [PATCH 1/3] patch-ids: turn off rename detection Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:12     ` Jacob Keller
2016-09-07 22:04   ` [PATCH 2/3] diff_flush_patch_id: stop returning error result Jeff King
2016-09-08  0:51     ` Ramsay Jones
2016-09-08  7:20       ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 10:28     ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-09 10:40       ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 12:58         ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-09-09 19:37           ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:04   ` [PATCH 3/3] patch-ids: use commit sha1 as patch-id for merge commits Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:28     ` Jacob Keller
2016-09-07 22:38       ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:51   ` [RFC/PATCH v2 0/3] patch-id for merges Josh Triplett
2016-09-08  7:30     ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:34   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:34     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] patch-ids: turn off rename detection Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:34     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] patch-ids: define patch-id of merge commits as "null" Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:37       ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 21:13       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-09 21:01     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] patch-id for merges Junio C Hamano
2016-09-12 15:59       ` Jeff King
2016-09-12 17:18         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-12 17:56           ` Jeff King
2016-09-12 20:44             ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-25 18:25     ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1609091455180.129229@virtualbox \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kewillf@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.