From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:29:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([IPv6:2a01:7a0:2:106d:700::1]:54133 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23990392AbdJSN3aZGNbJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:29:30 +0200 Received: from hsi-kbw-5-158-153-52.hsi19.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([5.158.153.52] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1e5At3-0008BA-E1; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:29:25 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:29:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Matt Redfearn cc: Daniel Lezcano , James Hogan , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, James Hogan , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clockevents: Retry programming min delta up to 10 times In-Reply-To: <5b782526-b130-77f2-6d9a-15839e12e065@mips.com> Message-ID: References: <1508414135-29123-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@mips.com> <5b782526-b130-77f2-6d9a-15839e12e065@mips.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 60469 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tglx@linutronix.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Matt Redfearn wrote: > On 19/10/17 13:43, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > delta = 0; > > for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { > > delta += dev->min_delta_ns; > > dev->next_event = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), delta); > > clc = ..... > > ..... > > > > That makes it more likely to succeed fast. Hmm? > > That will set the target time to increasing multiples of min_delta_ns in the > future, right? Yes, but without fiddling with min_delta_ns itself. > Sure, it should make it succeed faster - I'll make it like > that. Are you OK with the arbitrarily chosen 10 retries? I lost my crystalball so I have to trust yours :) Thanks, tglx