All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: julia.lawall@lip6.fr (Julia Lawall)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] Determination for the absence of an option in a function call
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:47:23 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802172047020.12418@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a43676a-fdee-236c-221e-f75a6bcd24f2@users.sourceforge.net>



On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > f(...,<+...__GFP_NOWARN...+>,...)
>
> Does this SmPL specification mean that the identifier can appear anywhere
> within the function call parameters?

Yes.

> Would it be acceptable for a risk level of false positives to omit
> the check for the really appropriate parameter position?

Up to you to see what happens.

julia

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-17 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-17 16:00 [Cocci] Determination for the absence of an option in a function call SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-17 16:05 ` Julia Lawall
     [not found]   ` <2b678153-b7c0-6100-6d9c-624bd61e2b78@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 16:42     ` Julia Lawall
     [not found]       ` <a3c2fbd6-00f4-0113-aab8-4caeed631e1c@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 17:09         ` Julia Lawall
     [not found]           ` <b65bd20c-de90-2136-b375-246b873cf2a3@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 17:44             ` Julia Lawall
     [not found]               ` <d6ebe937-81ef-5556-7d00-f7b914521608@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 18:17                 ` Julia Lawall
     [not found]                   ` <81e498d6-294a-8542-9338-50ca8e96303c@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 19:05                     ` [Cocci] Handling of variations in function call parameters Julia Lawall
     [not found]               ` <2a43676a-fdee-236c-221e-f75a6bcd24f2@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 19:47                 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
     [not found]                   ` <5e69411a-310d-f80b-6bd6-48158f5a1afd@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 20:25                     ` [Cocci] Determination for the absence of an option in a function call Julia Lawall
     [not found]                       ` <e0b2f3b9-28bc-f4d4-01fc-f80317926bc4@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 20:36                         ` [Cocci] Checking for questionable error messages after failed memory allocations Julia Lawall
     [not found]                           ` <ac659e87-6e0a-8c7a-dcd9-fe79035123d6@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-02-17 20:55                             ` Julia Lawall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1802172047020.12418@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.