From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF8A6538A for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:18:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=ISFcuaDdjYHv+PSCxdo2+m4YfH1TBzY8Y4m1ACaEKyo=; b=FiNcFORFRmuNoV0IXXsHjZkudDfXkLtHE+cjWgqDyIHByVdxtBM1kKyj tHz2lKE8uLAZZ9ql5rWYUaxzF7aIq6RgvLWM7xSTTobIFDt3SdlweoRvu IUzKXnW+hengzUwFOEs72x80DSpD6uS5p8OpGxAS9QfLK+o9De3HCSA2W g=; Authentication-Results: mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=julia.lawall@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,254,1673910000"; d="scan'208";a="49934145" Received: from 231.85.89.92.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([92.89.85.231]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2023 18:18:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 18:18:14 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Sumitra Sharma cc: "Fabio M. De Francesco" , outreachy@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: qlge: Remove parenthesis around single condition In-Reply-To: <20230312171517.GF28100@ubuntu> Message-ID: References: <20230312071700.GH14247@ubuntu> <5367184.29KlJPOoH8@suse> <20230312171517.GF28100@ubuntu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: outreachy@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 12 Mar 2023, Sumitra Sharma wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 11:39:17AM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > On domenica 12 marzo 2023 08:17:00 CET Sumitra Sharma wrote: > > > Hi Fabio, > > > > > > Thank you for the insights. > > > > Hi Sumitra, > > > > Please pay attention to the suggestions that Julia kindly provides to you. > > > > A moment ago I read these other words from her to you: "Sorry to press the > > point, but you should be doing it now, not promising to do it in the future.". > > > > She is sorry to press because of her special attitudes. I've been helped > > uncountable times by Julia who, despite her major role and commitments, is so > > kind to spend time here in a Sunday morning. > > > > I think that it's you who should be sorry for pushing her that way... > > > > You are doing it again and again: in your last message you did not provide the > > necessary context. You are asking me to recall which "insights" you are > > talking about. I know for sure that here there is someone who read hundreds of > > emails per day. > > > > > I went to the .rst files because they are directly > > > linked in the first-patch document. I also noticed the difference between a > > > ".rst" file and its counter human readable ".html" file. You were right that > > > many information is being missed when anyone will read the .rst instead of > > > .html/.pdf. > > > > Don't summarize my own words in order to make me understand what question you > > are answering. Just put my question/objection/comment inline while replying. > > > > Most mentors here read several tens of emails per day. You should not expect > > them to skim the whole thread. Just reply inline, so they find all the > > necessary context in one place and so there is no need to traverse the thread > > to understand what you are referring to. > > > > You have been told so several times. You risk that someone starts to ignore > > your messages in order to save time for other applicants. > > > > I am sorry for repeating my mistakes again and again as I was struggling > setting up the inbox in email-client and because of which I was unable > to respond inline. However, with the help of julia now I have set up the > inbox well. Hope this time I am doing it correctly. > This looks perfect. Under the text you are responding to, and with some blank lines around it, so it it easy to see. Thanks! julia > > > I would like to suggest that the links that redirect to the .rst > > > source files in the first-patch document must be changed to the links that > > > redirect to there corresponding human readable format. Let me know if I > > could > > > do it under the [KERNEL NEWBIEs ACCESS]. > > > > This is a great idea and I fully agree with you. > > Please ask Alison to grant access to change that documentation (it's not > > something I can do myself). > > > > > Apart from this I will be happy to patch the style guide after this > > > contribution period. > > > > Best applicants go on with further contributions after the end of these > > period. This fact has been observed several times in the other rounds. > > I'd like to see more people who are seriously willing to be part of this > > Community, regardless of the Outreachy project's deadlines. > > > > I would be happy to be part of the community. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sumitra > > > > Thanks, > > > > Fabio > > > > P.S.: I probably went a bit too far in the first part of this email. I am > > sorry about it. However, please demonstrate that you finally got it, not with > > further promises but with actual changes in the way you communicate :-) > > > > > > > >