From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B0A2C3DA6E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 06:37:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:message-id:references: mime-version:subject:reply-to:sender:list-id:list-help: list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:list-post:list-owner: list-archive; bh=JfUNOgTQU6F4dJOA3aGmidWCLSejoqCRXC4v4MqLn2E=; b=U6HEz5eOboDvhKYAI9m/BjmNpUbbvqgeYCfqyG6h469oXzgvfSn6SoaC rQCKlz6e8Rs5UBXfsfhIzTDlI4VzLd0+0e2C/zhyghJjJ539ymoFv4p7p 1KoufcFGVKXWEn/p2W3oz8G8zCi9U3rZjJ1jrOnRPHcH032VjsTUETwzh Q=; Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of cocci-owner@inria.fr designates 128.93.162.160 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=128.93.162.160; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-sender="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 include:mailout.safebrands.com a:basic-mail.safebrands.com a:basic-mail02.safebrands.com ip4:128.93.142.0/24 ip4:192.134.164.0/24 ip4:128.93.162.160 ip4:89.107.174.7 mx ~all" Received-SPF: None (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@sympa.inria.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=128.93.162.160; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@sympa.inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-owner@inria.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@sympa.inria.fr; dkim=hardfail (signature did not verify [final]) header.i=@inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,340,1695679200"; d="scan'208";a="145295233" Received: from prod-listesu18.inria.fr (HELO sympa.inria.fr) ([128.93.162.160]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2024 07:37:56 +0100 Received: by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 20132) id 5DDD4E0CCC; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 07:37:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BD6E004E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 07:37:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=JfUNOgTQU6F4dJOA3aGmidWCLSejoqCRXC4v4MqLn2E=; b=bwPFkv+mCJ/rijeeCsbMsrGXRn0so+p0tnsLmKhsOBY3h+YQkH+3yOjj 5GU5grNFqcm3BXKuOD/zgdR5UoO85/RDi6JNnOpE7qoMGO+X9m+8ZmUAG 3eYWYEUlBuVXLwtCVF8GkXpbszbh9plIE2PDZSmEQd9Ur/HIlOs5ORc7v 8=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,340,1695679200"; d="scan'208";a="145295230" Received: from 231.85.89.92.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([92.89.85.231]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jan 2024 07:37:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 07:37:54 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Jakub Kicinski cc: Nicolas Palix , cocci@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20240107144227.273e0233@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <20240107103536.5719ce30@kernel.org> <20240107144227.273e0233@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [cocci] EXN: Coccinelle_modules.Common.Timeout Reply-To: Julia Lawall X-Loop: cocci@inria.fr X-Sequence: 1440 Errors-To: cocci-owner@inria.fr Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: cocci-request@inria.fr X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: On Sun, 7 Jan 2024, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 21:15:54 +0100 (CET) Julia Lawall wrote: > > > I couldn't google out any meaningful info about this. Is the timeout > > > something I can increase locally? Is something wrong? > > > > Perhaps if you pull from github it will work better now, ie keep going > > after the timeouts. > > Thank you! I fetched from github, and after an hour it's still making > progress, previously it error'ed out after 10 minutes or so! Great. > Next issue.. :) when I run with --use-patch-diff commit1..commit2 > I get these three lines for every spatch run: > > grep: warning: + at start of expression > grep: warning: + at start of expression > grep: warning: + at start of expression OK, will look into it. I think this comes from coccicheck, not from Coccinelle. julia