From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D91C04FFE for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 16:04:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:message-id:references: mime-version:subject:reply-to:sender:list-id:list-help: list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:list-post:list-owner: list-archive; bh=UnEy6eoNqJThJntvu5833bd1bauQD/BG/5Oj/ZRQkTM=; b=pGlC/7jUz8Yxxv9cWoXLd7s+i6RcOxgVInQu1No24n9jOCLAOXsgRzVP ojs+TmUG9eGwu1FBTXAuJ8h4Iid/H8gLjsArOUOwCEVurAI/H6QS86pmZ WrufoPKh50HV0G5yAXuJAkweOWBSWxh0uEw2plZ37JmtQzNUgPlyxjycD c=; Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of cocci-owner@inria.fr designates 128.93.162.160 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=128.93.162.160; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-sender="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 include:mailout.safebrands.com a:basic-mail.safebrands.com a:basic-mail01.safebrands.com a:basic-mail02.safebrands.com ip4:128.93.142.0/24 ip4:192.134.164.0/24 ip4:128.93.162.160 ip4:89.107.174.7 mx ~all" Received-SPF: None (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@sympa.inria.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=128.93.162.160; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@sympa.inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-owner@inria.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@sympa.inria.fr; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,154,1712613600"; d="scan'208";a="165199951" Received: from prod-listesu18.inria.fr (HELO sympa.inria.fr) ([128.93.162.160]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 May 2024 18:04:38 +0200 Received: by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 20132) id EB643E0CCC; Sat, 11 May 2024 18:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79007E004E for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 18:04:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=UnEy6eoNqJThJntvu5833bd1bauQD/BG/5Oj/ZRQkTM=; b=jt8zJxV85FTA2r8j4qYpjU+0xYesQb39/SNfWjyPVlJiq6so4P1ha4cG ZuaPG9jNs/xMmaGgUvWSSUkjqt/O4qz4bdc9OssVKta7Cr7wC2Iym2AS+ 96jH7vJvEY6/IqAc9uYJ5/ChHlsQ5cKwLvjI9JRYWGxM2tUHonI3oIHb2 M=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,154,1712613600"; d="scan'208";a="86774622" Received: from 231.85.89.92.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([92.89.85.231]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2024 18:04:34 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 18:04:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring cc: Julia Lawall , cocci@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <6f5533b1-cbf8-421e-8d7d-8435aa28b360@web.de> Message-ID: References: <52305da6-998c-273c-c4cc-b8fdb1d161b@inria.fr> <6f5533b1-cbf8-421e-8d7d-8435aa28b360@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-956322826-1715443474=:14453" Subject: Re: [cocci] Searching for repeated source code with SmPL? Reply-To: Julia Lawall X-Loop: cocci@inria.fr X-Sequence: 1714 Errors-To: cocci-owner@inria.fr Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: cocci-request@inria.fr X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-956322826-1715443474=:14453 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 11 May 2024, Markus Elfring wrote: > … > >> I would appreciate if multiple occurrences of code elements can be better detected > >> and transformed. > … > > Be more concrete about what you are not able to do. > > I hope that indicated communication (and data processing) difficulties can be adjusted > a bit more. > > See also another source code example: > > void my_test(void) > { > my_action(1); > my_action(2); > my_action(3); > } > > > See also a corresponding analysis approach by the means of a tiny script > for the semantic patch language: > > @display@ > @@ > my_action(...); > <+... > *my_action(...); > ...+> > > > Why is no diff output generated by the software combination “Coccinelle 1.2-00008-g75525032” > so far? Your semantic patch needs to be: @display@ @@ my_action(...); <+... when any *my_action(...); ...+> Without that, a call to my_action is forbidden in the region matched by the <+... ...+>. Because any kind of dot thing matches the shortest path between what comes before and what comes after (here the end of the function). julia --8323329-956322826-1715443474=:14453--