All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10)
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:29:59 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807121025310.10748@bbs.intern> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807090726200.686@bbs.intern>



On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>>>>>> Hi Gerhard,
>>>> 
>>>> Please run:
>>>> 
>>>> smartctl -t short /dev/sdc
>>>> sleep 300
>>>> smartctl -t long /dev/sdc
>>>> 
>>>> Wait 2-3 hours or more and:
>>>> 
>>>> smartctl -a /dev/sdc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm changing the disk one more time ...
>> 
>> Once you replace the disk please re-run the tests shown above and show us 
>> the output please.
>> 
>> How many SAMSUNG disks have you gone through, do they really fail that 
>> often?
>> 
>
> Hello Justin!
>
> Setup Power suppply:
> sda-sdd are on the same power supply cable, sde, sdf are on a second one.
>
> I changed the disk to a new SAMSUNG disk and the first raid resync did NOT 
> work and I had 1 reallocated sector ...
>
> Also the RMA guy at our very good computer store (http://www.ditech.at/) were 
> helpfull in changing the disks and he hates the SAMSUNG disks because of high 
> RMA rates ...
>
> But:
> smart checks were ok (details see below). The smart checks are shown as 
> aborted, but before running the next tests they were at "Completed without 
> error" (strange).
>
> Now sdc has it's own power cable and I'm running a raid resync now.
>
> Power supply is:
> ATX 385 Watt, ENERMAX PRO82+
>
> Load on power supply measured on 220V side with a true RMS Wattmeter:
> Power off: 6,5W
> Max seen at power up: 196W
> BIOS: 114,1W
> Linux idle: 92,0W
> 100% Disk I/O, 100% CPU load: 149,6W
> => Everything fine and as expected.
>
> I'll keep you up to date ...
>

Hello!

It looks like it works now without any problems:
*) Serveral RAID checks (once a day)
*) smartctl checks were fine
*) Only one reallocated sector
*) Writing the disk full with random data

So the possibilities for the fault are:
*) SATA power connector (most likely I would guess)
*) 4th disk is now ok
*) Other 220V power cable connector through the Wattmeter

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-12  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-05 16:57 Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10) Justin Piszcz
2008-07-05 17:35 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 17:35 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-07 15:04 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-07 15:08   ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-07 16:04     ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08  6:24       ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08  6:59         ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08  8:35           ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 10:31             ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08  8:34         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 10:33           ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08 13:15             ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-09  5:37               ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-10  1:27                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-12  8:29                 ` Gerhard Wiesinger [this message]
     [not found] <fa.u8J+BqAcxU1mg8ob9pMBJaAHBPo@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-05 18:38 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 18:54   ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 19:04     ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 22:53       ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 23:20         ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 23:50           ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 23:49         ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 19:28   ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-05 23:22     ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 23:24       ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 10:31         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 10:44           ` Hannes Dorbath
2008-07-06 12:13           ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 12:42             ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 19:51               ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-07  9:45         ` Mattias Wadenstein
2008-07-07  9:57           ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-07 18:14             ` Michal Soltys

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0807121025310.10748@bbs.intern \
    --to=lists@wiesinger.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.