From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.235.106.9] (helo=astoria.ccjclearline.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N8TG9-0002HR-NU for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:34:24 +0100 Received: from cpe00142a336e11-cm001ac318e826.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([174.113.191.234] helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N645m-0003y2-TR for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:17:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:17:17 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <4AF2EAF3.5020808@cs.put.poznan.pl> Message-ID: References: <1257427464-316-1-git-send-email-przemyslaw.wesolek@cs.put.poznan.pl> <20091105140617.GA27537@mi.fu-berlin.de> <4AF2EAF3.5020808@cs.put.poznan.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.235.106.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpjday@crashcourse.ca X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] boost-1.33.1: Corrected GNU_HASH error. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:34:25 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Przemyslaw Wesolek wrote: > Henning Heinold wrote: > > thanks for the patch, but I wonder who is using this older > > version. Mainly 1.3.36 is used. > > Did you mean 1.36? > > I agree, the older versions look like unmaintained for a long time. if you go to boost's home page, they don't even *list* versions earlier than 1.36: http://www.boost.org/users/news/ that's generally a good indication that it's time to start deprecating. and there's already a beta version of 1.41. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================