From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NB3YK-0005Rv-FY for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:43:51 +0100 Received: from cpe002129687b04-cm001225dbafb6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.235.241.187] helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NB3Ww-0001cL-W1 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:42:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:42:19 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: OpenEmbedded Development mailing list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.235.106.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpjday@crashcourse.ca X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: confused about where i2c-tools-3.0.2 came from X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:43:51 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII i'm puzzled -- only a few days ago, i was proposing updating the i2c-tools package from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 in the dev branch. there was a brief discussion that i shouldn't simply *remove* the 3.0.1 contents, just *add* what was needed for 3.0.2. i came back to do that this morning and there already *is* everything needed for 3.0.2 -- the conf/checksums.ini entry and the .bb file. now i check the git log file for conf/checksums.ini and i find: commit b3a5d14572d3ddf13e740f32a463afb7e6a2dc58 Author: Koen Kooi Date: Tue Dec 16 14:50:47 2008 +0100 i2c-tools: update to 3.0.2 i could have *sworn* 3.0.2 wasn't in my checkout of the dev branch, or i wouldn't have put any time into proposing an upgrade. how confused am i? how could i have not noticed that? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================