From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUJP7-000704-4G for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:29:56 +0100 Received: from cpe002129687b04-cm001225dbafb6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.235.241.187] helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUJN2-0007Gy-MS for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:27:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:27:03 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: OpenEmbedded Development mailing list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.235.106.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpjday@crashcourse.ca X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: bitbake and e2fsprogs-1.41.9? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:29:56 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII apologies as i accidentally deleted the emails i was going to respond to, the thread is here: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-January/016074.html and here: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-January/016097.html graham gower suggests that an upgrade to e2fsprogs might be the solution. i might have time later this week to try that upgrade unless someone else gets to it first and checks it in to the dev branch. what would be useful, though, is to get some confirmation that there really *was* a build error in the current version. otherwise, i'll be back where i started. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================