From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753059Ab0BQRIT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:08:19 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:44889 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752986Ab0BQRIS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:08:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:07:59 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Paul E. McKenney" cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch -tip/core/rcu] rcu: Convert to raw_spinlocks In-Reply-To: <20100217170249.GB6959@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20100217162054.114542795@linutronix.de> <20100217170249.GB6959@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:23:00PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The spinlocks in rcutree need to be real spinlocks in > > preempt-rt. Convert them to raw_spinlocks. > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Except that it conflicts with some of my patch stack. So I will apply > this on top of my stack and re-send, if that is OK. Please do. Thanks, tglx