All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:27:19 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004271725490.3318@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100427150919.GB16794@logfs.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1091 bytes --]



On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:

> On Tue, 27 April 2010 17:05:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 April 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 April 2010 16:24:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure that logfs doesn't rely on the BKL, but right now,
> > > > we're just pushing it down.
> > > 
> > > So why do you create logfs_unlocked_ioctl in the first place? ;)
> > 
> > I don't want to get caught in discussions on whether any of my patches
> > might introduce silent bugs in something I'm not maintaining. Also
> > to put pressure on maintainers by threatening them to make their code
> > ugly.
> > 
> > If you just add a patch to convert to ->unlocked_ioctl without
> > the BKL, we can drop this patch ;-)
> 
> I guess that's threatening enough.  Is this for the next merge window or
> still the current one?
> 

Hasn't the "current" merge window been over with for weeks? I was assuming 
that bkl push down, or other bkl patches are for the next merge window.

You can ask Linus whether he'll take a convert unlocked_ioctl now or not.

John

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-27  9:18 [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] dvb: push down BKL into ioctl functions John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] scsi: " John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 03/10] bkl: Fix up compile problems in megaraid from bkl push-down John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 04/10] bkl: Fix missing inode tw_chrdev_ioctl due to bkl pushdown John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 05/10] bkl: Fix missing inode in twl_chrdev_ioctl resulting from " John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 06/10] isdn: push down BKL into ioctl functions John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: " John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 08/10] v4l: always use unlocked_ioctl John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] drivers: push down BKL into various drivers John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown John Kacur
2010-04-27 11:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 11:54     ` John Kacur
2010-04-27 13:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 12:24         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-04-28 12:37           ` Hans Verkuil
2010-04-28 12:37             ` Hans Verkuil
2010-04-28 13:02             ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-04-28 14:46               ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-04-28 14:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-28 21:52           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 0/5] Pushdown bkl from v4l ioctls Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  6:44             ` Hans Verkuil
2010-04-29  7:10               ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-04-29  7:38                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-01  9:55                 ` Hans Verkuil
2010-05-01 10:47                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-01 14:58                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-01 11:11               ` Alan Cox
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 1/5] v4l: Pushdown bkl into video_ioctl2 Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 2/5] v4l: Use video_ioctl2_unlocked from drivers that don't want the bkl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 3/5] v4l: Change users of video_ioctl2 to use unlocked_ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 4/5] v4l: Pushdown bkl to drivers that implement their own ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 5/5] v4l: Remove struct v4l2_file_operations::ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 11:31 ` [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 12:19   ` John Kacur
2010-04-27 12:41     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 0/6] BKL pushdown into ioctl, continued Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:32       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:58       ` Jörn Engel
2010-04-27 15:05         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 15:09           ` Jörn Engel
2010-04-27 15:27             ` John Kacur [this message]
2010-04-27 15:32               ` Jörn Engel
2010-04-27 15:38                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 20:12                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 20:30                     ` [PATCH] logfs: kill BKL Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-19 12:51                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 15:36               ` [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 16:29                 ` John Kacur
2010-04-27 19:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 2/7] hfsplus: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 3/7] cris: push down BKL into some device drivers Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 17:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-30  7:53       ` Jesper Nilsson
2010-05-17  2:51         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 4/7] sn_hwperf: kill BKL usage Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 5/7] um/mmapper: remove " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 6/7] coda/psdev: remove BKL from ioctl function Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 7/7] smbfs: push down BKL into " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 12:40   ` [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 12:51   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-28 21:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1004271725490.3318@localhost \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jblunck@gmail.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.