All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: rt - BUG: bad unlock balance detected!
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:25:02 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007122305340.21145@localhost> (raw)


The following occurred on a tip/rt/2.6.33 kernel
(last sha1 42edbcbc3240b56cf89a426cbfe9c8d9051459c4)
plus two patches from John Stultz
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108928/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108927/

[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
-------------------------------------
sirq-net-rx/5/78 is trying to release lock (&lock->lock) at:
[<ffffffffa0650420>] ipt_do_table+0x8e8/0x968 [ip_tables]
but there are no more locks to release!

other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by sirq-net-rx/5/78:
 #0:  (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff8141d2ae>] 
rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x3a
 #1:  (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff8141d2ae>] 
rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x3a
 #2:  (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff81452bf7>] 
rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x3a

stack backtrace:
Pid: 78, comm: sirq-net-rx/5 Not tainted 2.6.33.5-rt23-tracing-dcachefix 
#1
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0650420>] ? ipt_do_table+0x8e8/0x968 [ip_tables]
 [<ffffffff810a30de>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xd6/0xe0
 [<ffffffff810a3937>] lock_release_non_nested+0xbe/0x23b
 [<ffffffff810acd7c>] ? rt_spin_lock_fastunlock.clone.2+0x9b/0xc0
 [<ffffffffa0650420>] ? ipt_do_table+0x8e8/0x968 [ip_tables]
 [<ffffffffa0650420>] ? ipt_do_table+0x8e8/0x968 [ip_tables]
 [<ffffffff810a41e6>] lock_release+0x17d/0x19f
 [<ffffffff8150eff0>] rt_spin_unlock+0x23/0x30
 [<ffffffffa0650420>] ipt_do_table+0x8e8/0x968 [ip_tables]
 [<ffffffff8100bff3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x25/0x92
 [<ffffffff81094abf>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xdb/0x234
 [<ffffffff81094c61>] ? cpu_clock+0x49/0x5c
 [<ffffffffa0660130>] ipt_local_in_hook+0x23/0x27 [iptable_filter]
 [<ffffffff81452eda>] nf_iterate+0x8a/0x10d
 [<ffffffff81466a31>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x380
 [<ffffffff81452fde>] nf_hook_slow+0x81/0x177
 [<ffffffff81466a31>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x380
 [<ffffffff81466e0c>] nf_hook_thresh.clone.1+0x5b/0x5d
 [<ffffffff81466e8a>] ip_local_deliver+0x7c/0xa3
 [<ffffffff814667d0>] ip_rcv_finish+0x5be/0x5e2
 [<ffffffff814672c5>] ip_rcv+0x414/0x443
 [<ffffffff81420984>] netif_receive_skb+0x7bf/0x7e9
 [<ffffffffa02fdefb>] rtl8169_rx_interrupt+0x560/0x68c [r8169]
 [<ffffffffa03013f4>] rtl8169_poll+0x3c/0x23b [r8169]
 [<ffffffff814214ba>] net_rx_action+0x15e/0x3fc
 [<ffffffff8104f0ce>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x6f
 [<ffffffff8106ae2e>] run_ksoftirqd+0x249/0x3be
 [<ffffffff81044b06>] ? need_resched+0x3f/0x46
 [<ffffffff8106abe5>] ? run_ksoftirqd+0x0/0x3be
 [<ffffffff8108b816>] kthread+0xa4/0xac
 [<ffffffff81004594>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff815100c0>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff8108b772>] ? kthread+0x0/0xac
 [<ffffffff81004590>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10

I've started to do a little debugging, some other info that might be 
useful:
#0:  (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff8141d2ae>]
ffffffff8141d2ae /home/jkacur/jk-2.6/net/core/datagram.c:230
function skb_free_datagram_locked lock_sock(sk);

#2:  (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff81452bf7>] 
rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x3a
ffffffff81452bf7 /home/jkacur/jk-2.6/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:878
function netlink_rcv_wake wake_up_interruptible(&nlk->wait);


                 reply	other threads:[~2010-07-12 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1007122305340.21145@localhost \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.