From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:18:32 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1304041516160.30499@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130404104319.42d97a8ad7badf00af7ef1e0@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:43:19 +1100
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> After merging the ext4 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/ext4/resize.c: In function 'ext4_resize_fs':
> fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available
> fs/ext4/resize.c:1882:10: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available
> fs/ext4/resize.c:275:9: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available
> fs/ext4/resize.c:287:9: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available
> fs/ext4/resize.c:299:9: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'ext4_mb_release_context':
> fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3347:6: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
I am afraid I do not understand why this is happening. The commit
simply replaces ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() with
ext4_get_group_number() which has the similar definition in the same
header file. Maybe someone knows what this is all about ?
>
> Caused by commit dc351389caa5 ("ext4: introduce ext4_get_group_number()").
>
> This build was done with gcc 4.6.3 if that matters.
>
> I have used the ext4 tree from next-20130403 for today.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 23:43 linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-04 13:18 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2013-04-04 13:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-04 13:27 ` Lukáš Czerner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-14 22:22 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-15 3:31 ` Zhang Yi
2025-02-13 22:58 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08 23:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-09 5:23 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2016-02-07 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-03 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-04 13:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-07-23 0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-23 16:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-07-23 17:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-07-23 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-07 1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-29 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-31 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-07 5:16 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-07 5:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-07 5:43 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-07 5:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-07 15:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-08 0:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-08 0:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-08 19:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-08-08 21:54 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-08-08 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-09 11:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-08-11 21:39 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-08-11 21:39 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-08-16 13:10 ` Michal Marek
2013-08-16 17:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-08-16 18:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-07-10 1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 1:48 ` Aditya Kali
2012-07-10 1:48 ` Aditya Kali
2012-01-03 0:35 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-05 21:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1304041516160.30499@localhost \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.