All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org,
	"Rogério Brito" <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Subject: Re: [Bug 41132] [BISECTED][REGRESSION] Regression with the IRQ subsystem introduced in 2.6.39 (and present in the 3.x version)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:42:46 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111301038560.2735@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzh-ST1-Hu+Ny25X5DkEqktv3ZDFP2NDOWx6N+vFbTM8A@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Thomas, Ingo?
> 
> I haven't seen any response to this one, and while clearly commit
> fa27271bc8d2 ("genirq: Fixup poll handling") was *supposed* to be a
> no-op, it isn't.
> 
> The commit message says "Shorter version with the same
> functionality.", but since it causes a regression, it clearly is not
> with the same functionality at all. And I assume that Thomas doesn't
> have a machine that actually ever triggers the spurious irq issue to
> begin with, so it probably was never tested.
> 
> In short, it really sounds like this should just be reverted, since
> the code clearly doesn't do what the commit message claims it does.
> 
> Comments?

Yes, Edward tracked it down already. One part of the fix is already in
your tree commit 52553ddffad. The second half is in my queue.

See below. Thanks,

    tglx

------>
>From edward.donovan@numble.net Sun Nov 20 02:57:17 2011
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:54:23 -0500
From: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maciej.rutecki@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

commit fa2727("genirq: Fixup poll handling") introduced a
regression that broke irqfixup/irqpoll for some hardware
configurations.  That patch removed a test that checked for
'action->handler' returning IRQ_HANDLED, before acting on the
IRQ.  Putting this test back restores the functionality lost
since 2.6.39.  In the current set of tests after 'action' is set,
it must precede '!action->next' to take effect.

With this and the previous patch to spurious.c, c75d720fca8a, all
IRQ regressions that I have encountered are fixed.

Signed-off-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net>
---
 kernel/irq/spurious.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index b5f4742..dc813a9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, bool force)
 	 */
 	action = desc->action;
 	if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
-	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) || !action->next)
+	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) ||
+	    (action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) ||
+	    !action->next)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Already running on another processor */
-- 
1.7.5.4



      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-30  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-41132-5003@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <201108160554.p7G5soeq002083@demeter2.kernel.org>
2011-11-22  8:10   ` [Bug 41132] [BISECTED][REGRESSION] Regression with the IRQ subsystem introduced in 2.6.39 (and present in the 3.x version) Rogério Brito
2011-11-27 20:22     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-28  3:46       ` Edward Donovan
2011-11-28  5:08         ` Rogério Brito
2011-11-28  4:07       ` [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll Edward Donovan
2011-11-30  9:42       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1111301038560.2735@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rbrito@ime.usp.br \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.