From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1EB6EE0073D; Fri, 16 May 2014 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com (unknown [64.235.106.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF16E0070F for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 07:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [99.240.204.5] (port=32838 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlIhH-0006cl-8N; Fri, 16 May 2014 10:01:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 09:58:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: Paul Eggleton In-Reply-To: <1719824.0zZr8HOhtR@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1628239.GfKczbckvq@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <1719824.0zZr8HOhtR@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - yoctoproject.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:01:34 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 16 May 2014 08:51:35 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly > > > involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support > > > for the team doing the IoT DevKit work. You should be able to build > > > images for Galileo using what's in meta-intel-iot-devkit directly; > > > you could also use the layers within it separately using your own > > > separate OE-Core / Poky tree, but it's not really designed to be > > > used in that way. If you really want to do it separately you should > > > take care to use all three layers (meta-clanton-bsp, meta-galileo, > > > and meta-iot-devkit) and set your DISTRO = "iot-devkit". > > > > possibly a silly question, but what are the dependencies between > > those three layers? i'm used to seeing layer dependencies listed in a > > layer's "layer.conf" file. if i look at the meta-iot-devkit layer, its > > layer.conf file says nothing about dependencies, but one of its kernel > > recipes, "linux-yocto-clanton_3.8.bbappend", is clearly a reference to > > a kernel recipe in the meta-clanton-bsp layer. > > > > i would thus have expected to see that dependency listed in the > > layer.conf file. has something about listing layer dependencies > > changed while i wasn't looking? > > No, nothing has changed. The separation here is probably not as > clearly defined as it ought to be. I guess what I'd say is, you > shouldn't look at this as a fully worked example of how to structure > things; it was put together out of various pieces and intended to be > used as a whole rather than separate components. fair enough ... i should be able to test this by end of day. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================