From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: if i deselect PCIEPORTBUS, why are iwlwifi PCIE modules still being compiled?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 05:28:46 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1405200526530.12158@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400574452.4474.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 03:49 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > quite possibly a silly question (which has never stopped me before),
> > but in perusing the PCIE code in the kernel source, i was looking for
> > sample code to demo in a classroom setting and picked on
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie, which i was *assuming* was
> > PCIE-dependent -- specifically, i was going to demo the Advanced-N
> > 6235 PCIE wifi card on an intel galileo board.
> >
> > but i thought it was a bit strange that the pcie/ subdirectory there
> > doesn't seem to depend on PCIEPORTBUS. as a test, i deselected
> > PCIEPORTBUS in a configuration and did a rebuild, and the source in
> > the pcie/ directory was recompiled.
> >
> > am i misunderstanding the function of the kernel config variable
> > PCIEPORTBUS? i notice that .../iwlwifi/Makefile includes the line:
> >
> > iwlwifi-objs += pcie/drv.o pcie/rx.o pcie/tx.o pcie/trans.o
> >
> > which simply compiles those files with no regard to dependency. can
> > someone clarify this? thanks.
>
> The whole driver depends on CONFIG_PCI, maybe it should depend on
> something more PCIe specific, but that wasn't easy to sort out, and
> the APIs it needs aren't PCIe specific afaict.
ok, i'll have to think about that for a few minutes. am i at least
correct in my understanding that, technically, the kernel config
option PCIEPORTBUS is supposed to control whether one wants basic PCIE
support or not?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 7:49 if i deselect PCIEPORTBUS, why are iwlwifi PCIE modules still being compiled? Robert P. J. Day
2014-05-20 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2014-05-20 9:28 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2014-05-20 10:20 ` Johannes Berg
2014-05-20 10:26 ` Robert P. J. Day
2014-05-20 9:34 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1405200526530.12158@localhost \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.