From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 10C2CE00C12; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:06:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com (astoria.ccjclearline.com [64.235.106.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F0DE00BFD for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [69.196.158.250] (port=47315 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wws9o-0001RI-RR for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:06:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: Yocto discussion list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - yoctoproject.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: should yocto ref manual variable glossary include bitbake variables? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:06:39 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII more pedantry -- reading both the bitbake user manual and the yocto reference manual variable glossaries: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual.html#ref-variables-glossary http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#ref-variables-glos and i notice, as a single example, the first mentions the variable ASSUME_PROVIDED while the second does not. is this deliberate? is there an explicit distinguishing of variables that belong to different layers of the build system across the variable glossaries in different manuals? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================