All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Christopher Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Cc: BitBake developer list <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: distinguishing between bitbake and "higher" layers WRT fetching variables [LONG]
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:55:23 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1406201152050.4233@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANn_x7Y9XJ-g861+9YEsXtVNwF-krtf7QBgrG50PxUdEPw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2052 bytes --]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Christopher Larson wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>         (note: more annoying pedantry regarding bitbake configuration and
>       documentation but, if i'm going to explain this to my students, i
>       really need to understand it completely.)
>
>         some questions and observations about how bitbake defines some
>       fetch-related variables as opposed to how those variables are defined
>       in higher layers such as oe-core and poky. as richard purdie(?)
>       pointed out recently, the goal should be to document bitbake as
>       independently as possible from what happens in layers such as oe and
>       poky, but it seems this is not as clean as it could be.
>
>         consider first bitbake's current bitbake.conf file. first, can we
>       agree that this set of variables:
>
>
> Before I dive into the remainder of the email, we should note that
> the bitbake.conf in bitbake is never used when you use oe, it's
> solely as an example / starting point for other non-oe projects
> wanting to use bitbake. Presumably it gets forgotten about when
> changes to bitbake itself are made, and so it's fallen behind.

  oh, i realize that but (i think) my main point was that it seems
almost impossible to document bitbake completely stand-alone when
almost everyone is going to use it in the context of a higher layer
like OE, and there just seem to be unnecessary inconsistencies between
bitbake and OE that make the bitbake user manual confusing.

  more in a bit ...

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-20 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-20 15:47 distinguishing between bitbake and "higher" layers WRT fetching variables [LONG] Robert P. J. Day
2014-06-20 15:54 ` Christopher Larson
2014-06-20 15:55   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2014-06-20 16:09     ` Christopher Larson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1406201152050.4233@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.