All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: OpenEmbedded Development mailing list
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: defining FEATURE_PACKAGES_* in core-image.bbclass vs image.bbclass
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:22:20 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407141919070.5707@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsK-p7rV+HmdcskYkU0MYRn1zesYDgOUb4raVcj6_xW9x_ag@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Rudolf Streif wrote:

> >   then i noticed that the "splash" feature is defined, not in
> > core-image.bbclass, but in the more basic image.bbclass, as is
> > package-management:
> >
> > FEATURE_PACKAGES_package-management = "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE}"
> > SPLASH ?= "psplash"
> > FEATURE_PACKAGES_splash = "${SPLASH}"
> >
> > And then there is debug-tweaks for which the hooks are defined in
> image.bbclass including the function zap_empty_root_password but the
> post-processing is added to the variable by core-image.bbclass:
>
> core-image.bbclass: ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND +=
> '${@bb.utils.contains("IMAGE_FEATURES", "debug-tweaks", "",
> "zap_empty_root_password ; ",d)}'
>
> Since image.bbclass also adds the debug-tweaks to the valid image
> feature list
>
> image.bbclass:IMAGE_FEATURES[validitems] += "debug-tweaks read-only-rootfs"
>
> my inclination would be to move the addition to ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND
> from core-image.bbclass to image.bbclass.
>
> The image feature readonly-rootfs is also added to the valid list by
> image.bbclass.

  i didn't notice the rest of these as i stopped looking after the
splash example and thought i'd ask about it.

> Consequently this makes the image features splash, debug-tweaks,
> package-management, splash and readonly-rootfs available to image
> recipes that inherit image.bbclass while h/w codecs and others are
> added by core-image.bbclass and are only available when an image
> recipe inherits core-image.

  is there something special about hwcodecs that suggests it should
stay in core-image rather than moving to image as well? i'm just
trying to understand the rationale.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-14 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-14 19:05 defining FEATURE_PACKAGES_* in core-image.bbclass vs image.bbclass Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 22:43 ` Rudolf Streif
2014-07-14 23:22   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2014-07-15  0:36     ` Rudolf Streif
2014-07-15  0:39       ` Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-15 11:02   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1407141919070.5707@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.