From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 395 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:46:02 UTC Received: from smtp485.redcondor.net (smtp485.redcondor.net [208.80.204.85]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7465CE7 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by smtp485.redcondor.net ({3be039ea-4351-44b0-a8af-642c38b25916}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTPS id 20140715003927387 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:39:27 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from [99.240.204.5] (port=38934 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6qm9-0000Zl-8m for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:39:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:39:14 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-MAG-OUTBOUND: ccj.redcondor.net@64.235.106.9/32 Subject: Re: defining FEATURE_PACKAGES_* in core-image.bbclass vs image.bbclass X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:46:10 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Rudolf Streif wrote: > > is there something special about hwcodecs that suggests it > > should stay in core-image rather than moving to image as well? i'm > > just trying to understand the rationale. > > > Not necessarily. But I would consider them extended features and > they belong into core-image in my opinion. Not all embedded systems > need them. Many don't have video or audio support. I would even > suggest to move splash to core-image. If a device does not have > video there is not reason for a splash screen. > > I consider debug-tweaks, package-management, and readonly-rootfs the > basic image features to be in image. and i have no problem with that rationale. :-) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================