diff for duplicates of <alpine.LNX.2.11.1502052134270.756@localhost> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 85dfd7a..4514bde 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Tormod Volden wrote: > >> } > >> } else { /* ---- PAL ---- */ > >> /* We don't play around with FSCI in PAL mode */ -> >> - if(resindex = 0x04) { +> >> - if(resindex == 0x04) { > >> - SiS_SetCH70xxANDOR(SiS_Pr,0x20,0x00,0xEF); /* loop filter off */ > >> - SiS_SetCH70xxANDOR(SiS_Pr,0x21,0x01,0xFE); /* ACIV on */ > >> - } else { @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Tormod Volden wrote: > > > > Lines 7934-7981 consider three variables: PAL, overscan, and resindex. > > Given the "#ifdef 0" block, couldn't the current six sections collapse -> > into two? One for (!PAL && overscan && resindex=5) and another for the +> > into two? One for (!PAL && overscan && resindex==5) and another for the > > rest? > > Are we sure there isn't a typo in one of the duplicate clauses? Or diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 65d0909..86a09a2 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\0CAArsGaaTfkYcmL2tbxdbv_Jjwuj6HLE3URxHpq4-ju8wK-Ga7w@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH RFC] video: fbdev: sis: condition with no effect\0" - "Date\0Thu, 05 Feb 2015 23:37:23 +0000\0" + "Date\0Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:37:23 +0000 (UTC)\0" "To\0Tormod Volden <lists.tormod@gmail.com>\0" "Cc\0Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>" Thomas Winischhofer <thomas@winischhofer.net> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ "> >> }\n" "> >> } else { /* ---- PAL ---- */\n" "> >> /* We don't play around with FSCI in PAL mode */\n" - "> >> - if(resindex = 0x04) {\n" + "> >> - if(resindex == 0x04) {\n" "> >> - SiS_SetCH70xxANDOR(SiS_Pr,0x20,0x00,0xEF); /* loop filter off */\n" "> >> - SiS_SetCH70xxANDOR(SiS_Pr,0x21,0x01,0xFE); /* ACIV on */\n" "> >> - } else {\n" @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ "> >\n" "> > Lines 7934-7981 consider three variables: PAL, overscan, and resindex.\n" "> > Given the \"#ifdef 0\" block, couldn't the current six sections collapse\n" - "> > into two? One for (!PAL && overscan && resindex=5) and another for the\n" + "> > into two? One for (!PAL && overscan && resindex==5) and another for the\n" "> > rest?\n" "> \n" "> Are we sure there isn't a typo in one of the duplicate clauses? Or\n" @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ "\n" Thanks for pointing out that it hasn't been maintained, I missed that. -b966c65aaec8fb99a530d823a568480484bb612f738a88a39d6a25d343ca7735 +1c7ec3b1e4db34d89f221d12010ed15bedc0c7438b2b2d4d7b1795e327201c84
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.