Re: [PATCH 04/10] xl: improve return code for freemem function

["Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>]

On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Paulina Szubarczyk wrote:
> - Return 0 or 1 for freemem function
> - Correct the condition of checking return values of freemem
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulina Szubarczyk <paulinaszubarczyk@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 26 +++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
> index 7750995..7ee6953 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
> @@ -2678,38 +2678,34 @@ static int preserve_domain(uint32_t *r_domid, libxl_event *event,
>  
>  static int freemem(uint32_t domid, libxl_domain_build_info *b_info)
>  {
> -    int rc, retries = 3;
> +    int retries = 3;
>      uint32_t need_memkb, free_memkb;
>  
>      if (!autoballoon)
>          return 0;
>  
> -    rc = libxl_domain_need_memory(ctx, b_info, &need_memkb);
> -    if (rc < 0)
> -        return rc;
> +    if (libxl_domain_need_memory(ctx, b_info, &need_memkb) < 0)
> +        return 1;

As noted on patch 02/10, this is against libxl coding style.

Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel