Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: zswap: free synchronous-IO writeback folios directly

[Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 11:36:39AM +0800, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> When zswap writes an entry back, it allocates a swap cache folio,
> decompresses the entry into it and writes it out. That folio is cold by
> construction, but it is currently left on the LRU for page reclaim to find
> and free later. This wastes a reclaim scan and keeps cold memory resident
> longer than necessary.
> 
> For synchronous-IO swap devices writeback completes in the calling context,
> so the folio can be freed right after the write rather than left behind; do
> that. Because it is freed directly rather than through reclaim, it is
> allocated off the LRU: dropping the last reference on a folio still on the
> LRU would trip the free-time page-flag checks. A folio that a concurrent
> swapin has meanwhile claimed is left in place and reclaimed as usual.
> 
> Asynchronous and filesystem-backed swap complete writeback in interrupt
> context, where the folio cannot be freed; they are handled in a later
> change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
> ---
>  mm/swap.h       |  3 ++-
>  mm/swap_state.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  mm/zswap.c      | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> index 77d2d14eda42..c617e5a0257f 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.h
> +++ b/mm/swap.h
> @@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry);
>  void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio);
>  struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t target_entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  				     unsigned long orders, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> -				     struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx);
> +				     struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx,
> +				     bool skip_lru);
>  /* Below helpers require the caller to lock and pass in the swap cluster. */
>  void __swap_cache_add_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>  			    struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry);
> diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> index 9c3a5cf99778..048efc7ca612 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,8 @@ void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>  static struct folio *__swap_cache_alloc(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>  					swp_entry_t targ_entry, gfp_t gfp,
>  					unsigned int order, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> -					struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx)
> +					struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx,
> +					bool skip_lru)
>  {
>  	int err;
>  	swp_entry_t entry;
> @@ -484,7 +485,8 @@ static struct folio *__swap_cache_alloc(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>  	lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr_pages);
>  
>  	/* Caller will initiate read into locked new_folio */
> -	folio_add_lru(folio);
> +	if (!skip_lru)
> +		folio_add_lru(folio);
>  	return folio;
>  }
>  
> @@ -507,7 +509,8 @@ static struct folio *__swap_cache_alloc(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>   */
>  struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t targ_entry, gfp_t gfp,
>  				     unsigned long orders, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> -				     struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx)
> +				     struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx,
> +				     bool skip_lru)

Compared to the bool skip_lru here, will this work better? (not tested)

diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 8afd0b2d7c27..7ff5254b6ff8 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -487,9 +487,6 @@ static struct folio *__swap_cache_alloc(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
 
        node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr_pages);
        lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr_pages);
-
-       /* Caller will initiate read into locked new_folio */
-       folio_add_lru(folio);
        return folio;
 }
 
@@ -651,6 +648,8 @@ static struct folio *swap_cache_read_folio(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp,
                if (folio)
                        return folio;
                folio = swap_cache_alloc_folio(entry, gfp, orders, NULL, mpol, ilx);
+               if (!IS_ERR(folio))
+                       folio_add_lru(folio);
        } while (PTR_ERR(folio) == -EEXIST);
 
        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio))
@@ -692,6 +691,8 @@ struct folio *swapin_sync(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp,
                if (folio)
                        return folio;
                folio = swap_cache_alloc_folio(entry, gfp, orders, vmf, mpol, ilx);
+               if (!IS_ERR(folio))
+                       folio_add_lru(folio);
        } while (PTR_ERR(folio) == -EEXIST);

It's identical code wise, just fewer arguments and changes.

Prehaps also rename swap_cache_alloc_folio to __swap_cache_alloc_folio
and update kdoc that caller need to ensure the folio won't be leaked off-LRU
and unreclaimable now.