All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, frank.li@kernel.org,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:00:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amDbGHRbObX-lt5F@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722111640.1146212-3-devverma@amd.com>

On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:46:39PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote:
> As per, 'Designware Cores PCI Express DM Controller - Reference
> Manual', section 3.2.34.3, VSEC for DEVICE INFORMATION supports
> the channel separation mechanisms. Basically, the HDMA IP allows
> the user to configure the separation between DMA channel
> registers and retrieve it via the VSEC capability mentioned
> above.
>
> HDMA IP supports the channel separation up to 32K but for
> the simplicity channel separation support has been added till
> 4K. As and when required the function can be expanded to include
> the higher sizes for channel separation.
> Supported and missed out sizes are:
> 8K (0x5), 16K (0x6), 32K (0x7)
>
> Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> index ec5e057a0f11..6295d01ba2f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_ID			0x20
>  #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_BAR		GENMASK(10, 8)
>  #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_MAP		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_CH_SEP		GENMASK(18, 16)

Can keep as bit pos order for the same register?

>  #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH		GENMASK(9, 0)
>  #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH		GENMASK(25, 16)
>
> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ struct dw_edma_pcie_data {
>  	u16				wr_ch_cnt;
>  	u16				rd_ch_cnt;
>  	u64				devmem_phys_off;
> +	u32				ch_sep_sz;
>  };
>
>  static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data snps_edda_data = {
> @@ -127,7 +129,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_mdb_data = {
>  };
>
>  static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_cpm6_dma_data = {
> -	/* MDB registers location */
> +	/* CPM6 registers location */
>  	.rg.bar				= BAR_0,
>  	.rg.off				= SZ_4K,	/*  4 Kbytes */
>  	.rg.sz				= SZ_8K,	/*  8 Kbytes */
> @@ -189,6 +191,23 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_irq_vector(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr)
>  	return pci_irq_vector(to_pci_dev(dev), nr);
>  }
>
> +static u32 dw_edma_get_ch_sep_sz(u32 ch_sep_val)
> +{
> +	switch (ch_sep_val) {
> +	default:
> +	case 0:
> +		return 256;
> +	case 1:
> +		return 512;
> +	case 2:
> +		return 1024;
> +	case 3:
> +		return 2048;
> +	case 4:
> +		return 4096;
> +	}

	256 << ch_sep_val ?


> +}
> +
>  static u64 dw_edma_pcie_address(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t cpu_addr)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> @@ -278,6 +297,8 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
>  	pdata->mf = map;
>  	pdata->rg.bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val);
> +	pdata->ch_sep_sz = dw_edma_get_ch_sep_sz(FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_CH_SEP,
> +							   val));
>
>  	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0xc, &val);
>  	pdata->wr_ch_cnt = min(pdata->wr_ch_cnt,
> @@ -324,9 +345,9 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	struct dw_edma_pcie_data *pdata = (void *)pid->driver_data;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct dw_edma_chip *chip;
> +	bool non_ll = false;
>  	int err, nr_irqs;
>  	int i, mask;
> -	bool non_ll = false;

unnessary change here.

Frank
>
>  	if (!pdata)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22 11:16 [PATCH v1 0/3] CPM6 Channel Separation Support Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Make Xilinx Macros Dev Name Agnostic Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 14:51   ` Frank Li
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:00   ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:22   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amDbGHRbObX-lt5F@SMW015318 \
    --to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=devverma@amd.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.li@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.