All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Nithurshen <nithurshen.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
	xiang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fsck.erofs: implement concurrent directory traversal
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:28:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amOEndBYjdJ8uAeb@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724144713.85393-1-nithurshen.dev@gmail.com>

Hi Nithurshen,

On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 08:17:13PM +0530, Nithurshen wrote:
> Hi Xiang,
> 
> I have implemented the concurrent directory traversal and ran
> the benchmarks to compare it against our single-threaded baseline.
> All integrity checks passed successfully. Note that this data is an
> average of 5 runs of extraction of the same file with purging all
> cache before each extraction.
> 
> Here is the extraction time breakdown and performance improvement:

As I told you the merging policy, each patch should have no
regression, if concurrent directory traversal is useful, please
just implement it as a base, I won't accept PATCH 1/2 since
it has regression and useless.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-21 12:01 [PATCH 0/2] fsck.erofs: implement multi-threaded extraction Nithurshen
2026-06-21 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsck.erofs: add multi-threaded decompression Nithurshen
2026-06-22  2:08   ` Gao Xiang
2026-06-29  9:55   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Nithurshen
2026-07-05 14:00     ` Gao Xiang
2026-07-06  6:05   ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Nithurshen
2026-07-06  6:10     ` Nithurshen
2026-07-08  2:31       ` Gao Xiang
2026-07-13  7:02     ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] " Nithurshen
2026-06-21 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] fsck.erofs: implement concurrent directory traversal Nithurshen
2026-07-05 14:05   ` Gao Xiang
2026-07-14  1:10   ` [PATCH v5] fsck.erofs: add multi-threaded decompression Nithurshen
2026-07-14  1:18     ` Nithurshen Karthikeyan
2026-07-26 11:01     ` [PATCH v6] " Nithurshen
2026-07-26 11:02       ` Nithurshen
2026-07-24 14:35   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fsck.erofs: implement concurrent directory traversal Nithurshen
2026-07-24 14:47     ` Nithurshen
2026-07-24 15:28       ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2026-07-24 15:32         ` Nithurshen Karthikeyan
2026-07-24 15:45           ` Gao Xiang
2026-07-24 15:53     ` Gao Xiang
2026-07-25  1:26   ` [PATCH v3 " Nithurshen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amOEndBYjdJ8uAeb@debian \
    --to=xiang@kernel.org \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nithurshen.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.