From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C341CC54EFC for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1372224.1619604 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1woczK-0006IS-Ql; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:34 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1372224.1619604; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1woczK-0006IL-O5; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:34 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1372224; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:33 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1woczJ-0006IF-AJ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:33 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1woczJ-00DJsI-0R; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:32 +0000 Received: from 224.pool85-54-217.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.217.224] helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1woczH-002c8w-21; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:16:32 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=7oGaqfsemSBSrXtzjs1/LsnbYBcTO+WY+Mx/Osl3AA4=; b=fHk7ZnKnNDW9UR4bbTqY6IcFcq 3cKULKbWQ8Vk5TurSQA02CW7SvCR4esP8A/2EhIwnnzK4CjQxd0ThvdlISXBc7CkBL7Zj0BdNGNPt vab0qcT0nCDRMdiRbqLlH4cqkhNwONykJ9qQwb9gdry/LsuPhLuhBpk1JgJXtAHXcn/U=; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:16:23 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Andrew Cooper , Teddy Astie Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/Intel: split model-specific freq calculation off of intel_log_freq() Message-ID: References: <80b20aa4-8954-47ed-85f0-3f09d46717cf@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <80b20aa4-8954-47ed-85f0-3f09d46717cf@suse.com> On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > ..., for that logic to become reusable. While doing so undo the open- > coding of DIV_ROUND_UP(). Also switch to the new struct cpuinfo_x86 field > names. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich AFAICT this doesn't introduce any functional change. Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, Roger.