From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B153C531F9 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wokg9-0006WH-FW; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:29:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wokg5-0006VT-8M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:29:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wokg4-0003Iq-2G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:29:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1785256151; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6fttAPFWMMH0k3ysF5dGuWsC1N77yJkzGBexDZdX8iI=; b=Xa/vUcJIGkljIM4H7eMmTTnxERgD1BPn6MP9ct9W2Ns2vnh29JWuh2TCHu66t+Mfqdejzp BgRqVcUgtJzJPh7nBxlKDESW9erSNp9Ks7vkg2iE8sGgdJIRC4DLDct8kzkJyGwgrRu5M8 sD1KjYIdKuJSXHa+WYbwP73wg+VH61s= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-327-ZiH-bbYRPvS-aq1VkkfToQ-1; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:29:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZiH-bbYRPvS-aq1VkkfToQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: ZiH-bbYRPvS-aq1VkkfToQ_1785256147 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A596C19560A3; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.44.49.201]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935F6300019F; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 18:29:02 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: "Denis V. Lunev" Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake , Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block-common: fix BDRV_WANT_PRECISE duplicating BDRV_WANT_OFFSET_VALID Message-ID: References: <20260724161158.445561-1-den@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260724161158.445561-1-den@openvz.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -2 X-Spam_score: -0.3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.58, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 24.07.2026 um 18:11 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben: > Should OR in BDRV_WANT_ALLOCATED instead. > > Actually there is not problem within the code right now as the value is > used as enum rather than flags but that is for now. Let us stay on the > safe side. > > Fixes: c33159dec790 ("block: Expand block status mode from bool to flags") > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev > CC: Eric Blake > CC: Stefan Hajnoczi Thanks, applied to the block-next branch for QEMU 11.2. Kevin