From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F3A73B583B; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785276474; cv=none; b=ezUJqmyyKji5Fj+5KI9BRb4vWz0aYdASp0OriOcT7weJrt0lH+pnFEhHwlFZTWoqEj+bu5R6vvn3Kxcj6+Eigh4O5bvYhZZDuxomRfyy+7Hokayi3zBzWxn6cgzizkbSPVjbtHCR291CmAoA9PZ3HkP6dvM3rZlFUWQe8UH6SVM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785276474; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UolEMvehXsDCGXhOGT+PQ60dtlXW5Fj3xlabNsXIbZk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tULlbw3EkQV3SMH4lRgw3vLU1Wzs5D6tHDIIwl44sGMBV4lxLjEz3ujmIxbw2pS84oxXx/1I4tFQ9mFOMl7nVdWSIveIDnkwju6266YzhI9mnmidEOFUhQU3AWnyx6Olqvw9FfSJ5ZkbzF27HmAULlg+ssLx62kE9nvpJjupQbY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=LNPOGY2E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="LNPOGY2E" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=W4Dy3XC6qV1NBDVHSm+NbhvnKY5yieX/MYpP17k22sI=; b=LNPOGY2EtqaZoCfhvpiM1Z9mVM R47JO4wkihzNcB0yiiZcpYy9lpohbIafNUZ3l2vHDkbSbGhdvC4gRNeckQrQswUlR5ccBYvJ/MT7T 30w9YM7x5pbW+UBQvlt4cR/zgunFQN2huxclA4gwk7WAA1qFsLtwB8QpCR8TaLJyBB+5ajZAhFziX Em0SlWdrnF812sHKXQcLyJkjU+YE2XW9vv3Vxn5beDDTppE5uxrj+l+2aDH+ie+/J91Rt5Lx3njkl 9XQiyF2OD4EmnrQzcvhvdz7E5Lr5JR8fjDHfhOAvdyCipuZ/5hpEGKGTd8UDF8VSPVlnpQAyDsDGC SKT30P5g==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wopxV-007zAH-0m; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:07:33 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:07:26 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Andrew Morton , Miaohe Lin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, Lorenzo Stoakes , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Shuah Khan , Naoya Horiguchi , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , "Liam R. Howlett" , lance.yang@linux.dev, Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/6] selftests/mm: add hwpoison-panic destructive test Message-ID: References: <20260630-ecc_panic-v10-0-c6ed5b62eea2@debian.org> <20260630-ecc_panic-v10-6-c6ed5b62eea2@debian.org> <20260727212402.09baa9381ca426273fad4719@linux-foundation.org> <20260728122016.30752d36c3b3c3af231efa9d@linux-foundation.org> <44f81bea-d64a-4f73-8665-46652a928c83@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44f81bea-d64a-4f73-8665-46652a928c83@kernel.org> X-Debian-User: leitao On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 09:21:40PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 7/28/26 21:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 02:29:39 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:57:13PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > >>> > >>> Sure. Should I make this change or should we wait until Breno has time to do it? > >> > >> Apologies for the delay. This is on my TODO list, and I'll prioritize it. > >> > >> Just to confirm: the feature is already in mm-next without the selftest, so I > >> only need to submit the C version of the test, correct? > > > > The bash script is still there, no known issues. > > > > We have the thing and tests are useful. I'd say retain it until the > > rewrite-in-C happens? > > Nacked-by: David Hildenbrand I have a draft of the selftest in C already and I will give it more bake time, and I will submit it until EOW. Sorry for the noise, --breno