From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83797C54F52 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395D940B53; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id fyPmPmHCEQcH; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=u-boot-bounces@lists.u-boot-project.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 2BA4440B41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.u-boot-project.org ; s=default; t=1785318004; bh=rK9eCGHMstV9me6RkpXo4Rz1Ukvk1hwRj7CyOXA1ECk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=NqipYHxySlEvhvTyHl6gi1MdI6LnUwU8utUleT0ZC+F8nHqZwNBkqZXlFuA1cAlkH 4dnUizxAv9FB7MlU7+j+smViI+SjRRidi243mzx8Md4Md7ZVrxL19Ll/HW+ZQLGXQ9 qXtNDBxBNTIPkfrX+5wt5/GWen7kFMMJIPZ47vT+vwQNjMk2B5Zw7UWAixcpzcCHv2 WqXBcUqe+jxT0Ka2kaLlyr5O39wgo8ttJnO2FICFU/3vtz8/dbYK7Goqq4gZWJNqRi ayJrmNI8AAl1Oj6eRgveMQbOQWy6NADp+xkiw7e28SKoT7t2g5km0mIpkVzG7IE1R9 rreFM3eWz7hDA== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA4440B41; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AEA490 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA7740B51 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZn9ASvEbs1k for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=2a01:238:438b:c500:173d:9f52:ddab:ee01; helo=phobos.denx.de; envelope-from=me@ziyao.cc; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org 2034340B41 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 2034340B41 Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [IPv6:2a01:238:438b:c500:173d:9f52:ddab:ee01]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2034340B41 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 8FFC08494B; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:39:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sender4-op-o12.zoho.com (sender4-op-o12.zoho.com [136.143.188.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF498404D for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:39:56 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1785317988; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=N2DklkJcO4hQf69Gd2qOvHzRJ0K6OqsaUnA1G+1YZWDBY4GyiiP6wQA/luCz9cxSXU8CynM5VNJYga5IHR47oHxFxJ7HrLBffO39k+8jWG7pzvtX/TYVzXCatSqu0F5ZnZowqQudDYaR0n5ZKUWVen14g6a9shRtJZeGjgDw8z0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1785317988; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=rK9eCGHMstV9me6RkpXo4Rz1Ukvk1hwRj7CyOXA1ECk=; b=DRnksUXaM6v/iduUcdmULg3GAmr+HtYMUkjaNm6rcI3ZCTmMcnwIOBYhWqOGBJCyaeptv47cyi2Y55Y/M56mM2CiOpgB1LPztNV1pJUFj2uGMPr48cQmQy1NuXtPwmF293YANnSFdel61+AlTS8Zw7lfWIBhu9F4p4mcVMqBq2o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=ziyao.cc; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=me@ziyao.cc; dmarc=pass header.from= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 17853179850321002.2076474931296; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 02:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:39:39 +0000 From: Yao Zi To: Conor Dooley , Milad , u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: minda.chen@starfivetech.com, rick@andestech.com, yunhui.liang@starfivetech.com, Yao Zi Subject: Re: VisionFive 2 eMMC boot issues. Message-ID: References: <7ec9c425-53c5-41a2-95e7-f185e8d340c5@conchuod.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ec9c425-53c5-41a2-95e7-f185e8d340c5@conchuod.ie> X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-Zoho-AV-Stamp: zmail-av-0.2.10.1.5.2/285.299.17 X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1785317988; s=zmail; d=ziyao.cc; i=me@ziyao.cc; h=Date:Date:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=rK9eCGHMstV9me6RkpXo4Rz1Ukvk1hwRj7CyOXA1ECk=; b=Zf5gZf6yIEvpYAH5kLoHeYnUZxv4DhWisuPVpVCdecCHMEJM7vLTKaRJiJQ2JJZ8 pPEy32YzjbiVMJ1WLkllLfsGXQcT6odfDwaVL6+aOwyhOQKHW7JiUwnbtRShW1ag9qV upfNhjQYpdv7EQGU7U+Taw2R9A3pPTlaEtL9riMo= X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ziyao.cc X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=ziyao.cc X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=ziyao.cc header.i=me@ziyao.cc header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=zmail header.b=Zf5gZf6y X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ziyao.cc X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=me@ziyao.cc X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ziyao.cc header.i=me@ziyao.cc header.b="Zf5gZf6y"; dkim-atps=neutral X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.u-boot-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.u-boot-project.org Sender: "U-Boot" On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On 28/07/2026 15:42, Milad wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Little reminder on this thread regarding my VisionFive 2 MMC boot issue. > > > > Archive link: > > https://lists.u-boot-project.org/pipermail/u-boot/2026-July/624724.html > > > > Just following up to see if anyone has had a chance to look at the details > > in my original message on the link. > > > > Thanks! > > I don't think you CCed anyone that cares about the platform on that > patch so that's probably the problem there. > > Is this the same issue that Ilya attempted to fix in the upstream version > of the devicetree for this platform? > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260306171939.84568-1-k0tran@altlinux.org/ Quoting logs in the link, > SD card (mmc1) fails to initialize in U-Boot. Full serial output: > > Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110 > ** Booting bootflow '' with efi_mgr > Loading Boot0000 'usb 0' failed > Error reading cluster > Loading Boot0001 'mmc 1' failed > EFI boot manager: Cannot load any image > Boot failed (err=-14) > Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110 > Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110 > Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110 > Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110 The problem happens in U-Boot shell instead of SPL stage, so it probably has nothing to do with the bootph-pre-ram change. Even if the pinctrl isn't available at SPL stage, it should still be picked by the proper U-Boot. > My subsequent PR for that lead to issues and it never got applied. > https://lore.kernel.org/soc/4dd4ffe6-307a-442b-ae99-50c88d4e5b84@freeshell.de/ > > This happened back in March, and I just have not had the time nor > inclination to actually sort it out, and nobody else has stepped up. > > I think I will just pick that one patch back up again and resubmit > it for this cycle. After all, it doesn't change the configuration, just > the point at which the configuration should be done. > > If you could let me know if that patch helps, then it would be another > argument for actually (finally) getting it merged. > > Thanks, > Conor. Best regards, Yao Zi