From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Shaojie Sun <sunshaojie@kylinos.cn>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shuah@kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/cgroup: remove unused user_usec read in test_cpucg_nice
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:58:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amnqUlrPxhTobE1E@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729100451.689458-2-sunshaojie@kylinos.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 06:04:50PM +0800, Shaojie Sun <sunshaojie@kylinos.cn> wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c
> index 7a40d76b9548..fe637e1d2fcd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c
> @@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static int test_cpucg_nice(const char *root)
> if (!WIFEXITED(status))
> goto cleanup;
>
> - user_usec = cg_read_key_long(cpucg, "cpu.stat", "user_usec");
> nice_usec = cg_read_key_long(cpucg, "cpu.stat", "nice_usec");
Good catch.
This test is anologous to test_cpucg_stats(), so the checks should be
analogous too, like:
user_usec = cg_read_key_long(cpucg, "cpu.stat", "user_usec");
nice_usec = cg_read_key_long(cpucg, "cpu.stat", "nice_usec");
if (user_usec <= 0)
goto cleanup;
instead of the removal.
Thanks,
Michal
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 265 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 10:04 [PATCH 0/2] selftests/cgroup: misc cleanups for test_cpu.c Shaojie Sun
2026-07-29 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/cgroup: remove unused user_usec read in test_cpucg_nice Shaojie Sun
2026-07-29 11:58 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2026-07-29 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/cgroup: write explicit period to cpu.max in max tests Shaojie Sun
2026-07-29 11:53 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amnqUlrPxhTobE1E@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sunshaojie@kylinos.cn \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.