From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F218A477295 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785335546; cv=none; b=eBQ8kPOrbf8jypysiGlM3yjH5wS7g30nJWpFinmu99BC2rvQ9ntcDXRniTHfzNX5q+LLc45D5HHImXWb4uAh8OkwAHj2Aw2JmwlR3y75MZJPnYTb5ryImdxEkGIOK8aPIZdS0XwW6BGBcfjzoX8X0Io6h+gC7LR75+2EJzOJUZk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785335546; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k4nwQh6Qy1WmrWi8mCLB0yZOEIm2Z3xORQuFdz7jyhI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Qu4DiSNusbN7dD1GtruP33qc+7pVvjqdLWAYnrkb8VKBRwRQrkyz7AnT9oppPLiRR5wf6FBaCCErEEAyx8quVx5rbla0eVy7maMLT+R7/OsFfBPG1iw5m3mqr+ZH8VqItqUaYuEerZvRo1uBN5ZxflN07/m84a6b9gG2aXjTLzM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=dqBRLJII; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="dqBRLJII" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=k4nwQh6Qy1WmrWi8mCLB0yZOEIm2Z3xORQuFdz7jyhI=; b=dqBRLJIITvIVmOqngsJJZZQip1 P2bKfQTzL4We01+KMm+vle1+QnjfJWLCQ8dtf/+OmVwK2iDRisuKALG8JwX2GPMtgfUdVaYHSTaeN HN8fNnL/dy/NTVMx8sozoBloArjpyQl6pSeSYUAA13muPryCoPko7AhYGHI6vqINC1JPpukwG+rdu 5QQAuhssArGkRFy5yCUgttSMRjiTniUpWOGphyJGWJUUtxAC09BGNasgkBCtJiiv7Wj/Jm8LDMUSr g3px0RvpDY5Suop93rYEw5Qp90jc7fv7y405NJ6P3efAk/lwgtRXvrzHyPhjK8SzFGHeJh8LeVVpV quYcGQIw==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wp5KW-008WA6-18; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:32:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:32:14 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Tejun Heo Cc: Lai Jiangshan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com, frederic@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Refactor the workqueue allocations Message-ID: References: <20260714-tejun1-v1-0-024d59241386@debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Debian-User: leitao Hello Tejun, On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 08:56:10AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Again, without thinking too deeploy about it, I think the code would look > better if we unify everything we can. I believe I have what I need to proceed. I'm planning a two-phase approach: First, refactor the code to improve modularity where needed keeping as-is behavior, then introduce the substantive changes once the initial refactoring is done. The goal is to make the code more managable and easy to digest. Please let me know if you prefer otherwise. --breno