From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>,
Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>, Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:13:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amsHrVCJnuXzeGG1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-blk-dontcache-v7-3-3e8e6850068d@columbia.edu>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 02:57:53AM -0400, Tal Zussman wrote:
> Set BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK on iomap writeback bios when a dropbehind folio
> is added. This ensures that bi_end_io runs in task context, where
> folio_end_dropbehind() can safely invalidate folios.
>
> With the bio layer now handling task-context deferral generically,
> IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE is no longer needed, as XFS no longer needs to
> route DONTCACHE ioends through its completion workqueue. Remove the flag
> and its NOMERGE entry.
>
> Without the NOMERGE, regular I/Os that get merged with a dropbehind
> folio will also have their completion deferred to task context.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
This seems to be missing the bug fix you identified for the double
deferral?
I although thought a bit how that could be done cleaner, see below:
> ioend_flags |= IOMAP_IOEND_SHARED;
> - if (folio_test_dropbehind(folio))
> - ioend_flags |= IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE;
I'd keep this flag.
> if (pos == wpc->iomap.offset && (wpc->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY))
> ioend_flags |= IOMAP_IOEND_BOUNDARY;
>
> @@ -256,6 +254,9 @@ ssize_t iomap_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio,
> if (!bio_add_folio(&ioend->io_bio, folio, map_len, poff))
> goto new_ioend;
>
> + if (folio_test_dropbehind(folio))
> + bio_set_flag(&ioend->io_bio, BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK);
And move setting the flag to iomap_ioend_writeback_submit, and only
for the case where no io_bio.bi_end_io is already assigned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 6:57 [PATCH v7 0/5] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 6:57 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] block: introduce bio_in_atomic() Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30 9:02 ` Jan Kara
2026-07-30 6:57 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] block: add task-context bio completion infrastructure Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30 9:29 ` Jan Kara
2026-07-30 6:57 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-30 20:39 ` Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 6:57 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] buffer: set " Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 9:31 ` Jan Kara
2026-07-30 6:57 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-07-30 9:33 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amsHrVCJnuXzeGG1@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=dhavale@google.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=guochunhai@vivo.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
--cc=zbestahu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.