From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5955242BE88 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785506865; cv=none; b=M+3Q/m4dOL5DtIBZr9J5Jfcu3nmRaLCl1DrdiD9eiT6Qd5gq2Lxqv8WA1Kej287781EHGKU7s0QBmHGTaVLmzhpYVZ6NMxYv50wegL3qgQviAxaUIEzLyakplJaJqvBfnyrPdise6Ouk+n+RtO4dbqLzCNoYai+EMfB+l6O3s4w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785506865; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZjvCaTm2EqthK1AMWFaApweT0SI1lxky39mY41z7+zM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NQ8Dm/R7+dUMSaz5lHhKdLNQ6poJOXdf0yTN0NhOXFoVTa9TMqrim+JGIjalW+MBe7zYuVSNDcMntbvToFYLchIRQ2enRA0xDqKff6Cev8AgQ+FmN1yRQSN3Pmp5MG7uv8+cnTcNDwrhQhYJmBQT3qC/19U/awJeOdu2SXzUHpk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=M3he0FiI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="M3he0FiI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1785506861; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZjvCaTm2EqthK1AMWFaApweT0SI1lxky39mY41z7+zM=; b=M3he0FiIgZZJDgjhxV8nBLev88JF4Nzotn22SuiNjCi2Vd0Jhzaecd/cuF81bOFcuQCUu/ I8VHI0nvRXLH+5i7vNdOeB+nkJPVj/CfUWvtILusU+bWBozr3aN3QWzbI6jomZLst7rZiJ 12JFb6pDBSqiUoCUqk1yIJRznm/nxw8= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-681-sVugMoitNhKVUbEeoRwQUA-1; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:07:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: sVugMoitNhKVUbEeoRwQUA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: sVugMoitNhKVUbEeoRwQUA_1785506853 Received: from mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.95]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE11194511F; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.44.33.21]) by mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C91441C; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fedora (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:07:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:07:26 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Christian Brauner Cc: Linus Torvalds , Breno Leitao , Mateusz Guzik , Jens Axboe , Pavel Begunkov , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , Alexey Gladkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers Message-ID: References: <20260731-blechnapf-arten-blasorchester-4e05dd1b2c58@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260731-blechnapf-arten-blasorchester-4e05dd1b2c58@brauner> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.6 on 10.30.177.95 On 07/31, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > But then we should name it "epoll_or_io_uring_pseudo_edgetrigger". > > See the test-cases, they demonstrate the same pattern. > > Wouldn't pseudo_edgetrigger be sufficient? I think the comment as you > wrote it is ok. I agree with any naming ;) even if I personally don't think that "pseudo" make the purpose any clearer, but this is minor. It seems that Linus doesn't really like this patch "in general", lets wait for reply from him... Oleg.