All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	 Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	 linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] hrtimer: Pause KCOV during deferred rearm
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:59:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <an1dEVKGlwbusXcS@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812102100.GF776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Deferred hrtimer rearm can run after HARDIRQ_OFFSET is dropped. in_task()
> > is then true, so KCOV attributes the instrumented timer-reprogramming
> > subtree to current.
> 
> But that is clearly noinstr code; there should be no kcov calls in
> there.
> 
> If kcov is emitted inside noinstr, then kcov is a broken piece of crap
> and needs to die.
> 
> NAK

Thanks for the review!

By "instrumented" I meant KCOV-instrumented. The selftest callback comes
from __hrtimer_rearm_deferred() in ordinary .text, not .noinstr.text.

On x86, irq_exit_rcu() runs in an instrumentable IDT-entry region.
__irq_exit_rcu() subtracts hardirq offset before calling
hrtimer_rearm_deferred(), so check_kcov_mode() sees in_task() and records
callee coverage for current.

This is the same class of failure as 477d81a1c47a ("x86/entry: Remove
unwanted instrumentation in common_interrupt()"). There the hardirq offset
had not yet been added, here it has already been removed. Its callee
could be inlined. 

Deferred rearm instead reaches shared hrtimer, tick,
clockevent and architecture code. Statically excluding the graph
would be pervasive and also lose coverage from ordinary task context.

Do you want deferred rearm and its complete call graph converted to
noinstr, or merely built without KCOV instrumentation?

Thanks,
Karl

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 15:41 [PATCH v2 0/6] kcov: Suppress timer and scheduler coverage leaks Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] kcov: Use unsigned int for kcov_start() mode parameter Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] kcov: Add a kcov_pause guard Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] hrtimer: Pause KCOV during deferred rearm Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-12 10:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-13  5:59     ` Karl Mehltretter [this message]
2026-08-13 13:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched/core: Pause KCOV in __schedule() Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-12 10:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched/core: Pause KCOV in try_to_wake_up() Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-12 10:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched/core: Pause KCOV in wake_up_new_task() Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-12 10:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-11 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] kcov: Suppress timer and scheduler coverage leaks Bradley Morgan
2026-08-12 10:36   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=an1dEVKGlwbusXcS@gmail.com \
    --to=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=include@grrlz.net \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.