From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BE630569F for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786625577; cv=none; b=VhUZSkWOq0Mr2iF8pmutAHZbET/zjiDtZ7xkf37DJL/tylKUTn89wfoDmLkrGdH9HC+KJx7MMpAflxOpo2ZY33Mtu3dMNzOupFkgqc3AxOOT23V+KwhlXae26juEVpytpjOH0UPO7BAbCczqhDaDLnzBsuGBU8HvyuLym9EYg4k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786625577; c=relaxed/simple; bh=01/rdNJxv3juJlXn6BvEXw+BoRHayQf8VQjIhhA3bJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=X3IP1+Y5j+oZEUXOySmrf9WiI72qrZ7/zZSyz5PfPy7MN6buXQw7FVsMnexGfjYrecm3zn4V4A4wnhfccUeMwbka7WyX63t+5Y8drOfa8hZ09EC6ntkFOMzlelI7xkgXOMelGvEqNRWSCJKLvvpVAmFmkkjidJDPBqJepShWmGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=U9xZSMr6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="U9xZSMr6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1786625573; bh=kC7rSbVrZ84yWjCH4EUFXakq3lZyIQ/JDqp7CNjEDSE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=U9xZSMr6nqjClqgxttjvOqGFCxmAA5OvmgW3/HXVlB/7gx8v3QMTnwYxEbPAFgbZJ 9vJJf16nI7KWMFNYKSZX0NWmu9PzND07QjG89TMWNSd2zSqfClpA5Gy1n4wZLDeplJ jqkjTzBJADg4wCAvYHgkIJ506bSVydn4Sj6nvrLpr88XZBgBKytO+5okzJ6KxdJPr+ 9YfF/x7/4u7Yll58EUE7JiWS3LmfmKmcvB8ZBv1fm2z9RNteK/JFwC9u3LShW0hDT3 f43b+yw5mu0DwQgHB+PFCnqLTA09FBr9rwB3YQQxiLU7mAEWnWk4MobF6IMnN2LWS9 wK7Ez3mBZFPmw== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 72CD16007C; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:52:50 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Phil Sutter Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Avinash Duduskar Subject: Re: [nft PATCH 0/2] tests: shell: Keep dumps with numeric protocol values Message-ID: References: <20260813114556.2685869-1-phil@nwl.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 02:12:46PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 02:00:22PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 01:45:54PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > Adjust the test wrapper to create dumps with --numeric-protocol option > > > (patch 1) and update all dumps (patch 2). > > > > Is this to make it consistent through different distros due to > > different definitions in /etc/services? > > Yes, but it's about /etc/protocols. See Avinash's attempt at eliminating > an actual problem there (and my response to it): > > https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/20260808013327.2766739-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/ Makes sense, thanks for explaining.