All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@kernel.org>
To: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, josef@toxicpanda.com,
	brauner@kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use mount idmap for defrag permission check
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:11:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <an36yH30W965eqZk@ubuntu-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd66065f-bae5-482a-84d6-a78850c9cebe@suse.com>

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 04:04:05PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2026/8/13 13:11, Tao Cui 写道:
> > From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > btrfs_ioctl_defrag() checks MAY_WRITE with nop_mnt_idmap, which skips
> > the mount idmap.  On an idmapped mount the owner comparison then uses
> > the caller's fsuid against the raw on-disk uid, dropping the mapping.
> > Every other permission/owner check in btrfs ioctl uses
> > file_mnt_idmap(file) (e.g. :1152, :1310, :1946); this one missed it.
> > 
> > Switch to file_mnt_idmap(file).  It equals nop_mnt_idmap on a normal
> > mount, and the check stays behind !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so only
> > unprivileged callers on idmapped btrfs change.  The RO-fd note in the
> > comment above is about the file descriptor, not this inode check, and
> > is unaffected.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Fixes: 4609e1f18e19 ("fs: port ->permission() to pass mnt_idmap")

This is a misattribution. Using nop_mnt_idmap there keeps the behavior
the same as it was before the commit. Switching to the mount idmap opens
up BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG* to idmapped users when they weren't before, which
is a separate policy decision that didn't belong in that change.

Saying that these ioctls should be allowed for idmapped users just
because others are isn't a good justification. Why are these ioctls safe
for idmapped users?  Do they actually require this capability?

Thanks,
Seth

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  3:41 [PATCH] btrfs: use mount idmap for defrag permission check Tao Cui
2026-08-13  6:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-13 17:11   ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2026-08-14  3:29     ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-14  5:15     ` Tao Cui
2026-08-14 15:25       ` Seth Forshee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=an36yH30W965eqZk@ubuntu-x1 \
    --to=sforshee@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.