All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:02:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <an7KyotZ5vZOURu2@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814072903.124991-4-physicalmtea@gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 03:29:03PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
>VHOST_SET_FEATURES is also used to update logging while a device is
>running. When ACCESS_PLATFORM stays enabled, allocating a new empty
>IOTLB on every call drops valid translations and forces avoidable
>misses.
>
>Initialize the device IOTLB only when one does not already exist.
>
>Fixes: e13a6915a03f ("vhost/vsock: add IOTLB API support")
>Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>index b69c260eaeff..9142fa1143b2 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>@@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
> 	    vsock->dev.iotlb)
> 		vhost_clear_device_iotlb(&vsock->dev);
>

Ah, okay, now I see why you did it in the other patch, but if we move 
dev.iotlb checks in the functions we can still do that.

>-	if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))) {
>+	if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) &&
>+	    !vsock->dev.iotlb) {
> 		if (vhost_init_device_iotlb(&vsock->dev))

IIUC vhost_init_device_iotlb() handles the case where dev.iotlb is 
already initialized and override it. Here we are preventing that.

Will we do the same in vhost-net? If yes, all the callers will call 
vhost_init_device_iotlb() with `dev.iotlb` NULL, so should we remove 
that behaviour and add the check we are adding here inside the 
vhost_init_device_iotlb()?

Or there is an use case where vhost_init_device_iotlb() is called with 
an already initialized dev.iotlb ?

Thanks,
Stefano

> 			goto err;
>-- 
>2.34.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14  7:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] vhost: add helper to clear device IOTLB Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:58   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:58   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates Jia Jia
2026-08-14  8:02   ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-08-14 11:56     ` Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14 11:56   ` Jia Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=an7KyotZ5vZOURu2@sgarzare-redhat \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.