From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, daniel@thingy.jp,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] selftests: fix build errors on alpine linux
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:34:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an7eC0oBvfjB6g54@pedro-suse.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813063401.1786548-5-thehajime@gmail.com>
/me puts on his libc hat
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 03:33:59PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> Some nommu architectures only work on Alpine Linux, which doesn't use
> glibc for the standard library. It uses musl-libc and is implemented in
> a different way as glibc, resulting build failures.
>
> This commit fixes this issue by adding missing definitions. The fixes
> are now only covered to TARGETS=mm which was tested for the moment;
> future contributions are needed to fully build/execute tests on nommu
> platforms.
>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c | 8 ++---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/mdwe_test.c | 4 +--
> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> index ae18c491ae53..ac21bf3d802e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <sys/utsname.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> #endif
>
> #ifndef ARRAY_SIZE
> @@ -81,6 +82,48 @@
> #endif
> #endif /* end arch */
>
> +#if !defined(NOLIBC) && !defined(__GLIBC__)
> +#ifdef __LP64__
> +typedef int64_t __fsword_t;
> +#else
> +typedef int32_t __fsword_t;
> +#endif
The code should not be using __fsword_t. Per statfs(2):
The __fsword_t type used for various fields in the statfs
structure definition is a glibc internal type, not intended for
public use. This leaves the programmer in a bit of a conundrum
when trying to copy or compare these fields to local variables in
a program. Using unsigned int for such variables suffices on most
systems.
and indeed if you look at musl's statvfs definition:
struct statvfs {
/* ... */
unsigned int f_type;
/* ... */
};
so it should be perfectly cromulent to use unsigned int here. Or use an
actual usable interface :)
> +
> +/*
> + * for a workaround to avoid struct conflict under
> + * musl-libc (<sys/prctl.h> v.s. <linux/prctl.h>)
> + */
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_H
> +#define _LINUX_PRCTL_H
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PR_SET_MDWE
> +#define PR_SET_MDWE 65
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN
> +#define PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN (1UL << 0)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PR_MDWE_NO_INHERIT
> +#define PR_MDWE_NO_INHERIT (1UL << 1)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PR_GET_MDWE
> +#define PR_GET_MDWE 66
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE
> +#define PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE 67
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE
> +#define PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE 68
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
This looks fine. It's the same old problem with musl and kernel headers.
> +
> /* define kselftest exit codes */
> #define KSFT_PASS 0
> #define KSFT_FAIL 1
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk b/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk
> index f02cc8a2e4ae..2cc819006424 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ clean: $(if $(TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR),clean_mods_dir)
> $(CLEAN)
>
> # Build with _GNU_SOURCE by default
> -CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE=
> +CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE= -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
What needs this?
>
> # Additional include paths needed by kselftest.h and local headers
> CFLAGS += -I${top_srcdir}/tools/testing/selftests
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> index fb4600570e13..aee6be530ccb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> @@ -22,12 +22,9 @@
> #include "kselftest.h"
> #include "hugepage_settings.h"
>
> -#ifndef STATX_DIOALIGN
> -#define STATX_DIOALIGN 0x00002000U
> -#endif
Why doesn't this fallback work?
> -
> static int get_dio_alignment(int fd)
> {
> +#ifdef STATX_DIOALIGN
> struct statx stx;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -43,6 +40,9 @@ static int get_dio_alignment(int fd)
> return 1;
>
> return stx.stx_dio_offset_align;
> +#else
> + return -1;
> +#endif
> }
>
> static bool check_dio_alignment(unsigned int start_off,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mdwe_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mdwe_test.c
> index 647779653da0..031c79ed067e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mdwe_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mdwe_test.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> +#include "kselftest_harness.h"
> +
> #ifdef __aarch64__
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> #endif
> @@ -14,8 +16,6 @@
> #include <sys/wait.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> -#include "kselftest_harness.h"
> -
> #ifndef __aarch64__
> # define PROT_BTI 0
> #endif
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
Honestly, I'm surprised you needed so few hacks for this! But if I am to
guess, there are certainly much more problematic selftests out there.
--
Pedro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 6:33 [RFC PATCH 0/6] fix nommu mmap and add nommu kselftests Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-13 6:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm: nommu: fix do_mremap() to correctly update internal states Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 11:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 6:33 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm: nommu: use vma_is_anonymous() to check if vmas are anonymous Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 11:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 6:33 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm: nommu: fix an issue on map request to /dev/zero Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-13 12:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-13 12:43 ` Daniel Palmer
2026-08-13 13:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 13:51 ` Daniel Palmer
2026-08-13 13:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 14:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-14 12:42 ` Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 13:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 14:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-13 14:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-14 9:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-08-13 13:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-13 13:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 13:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 14:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-14 12:42 ` Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 12:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 6:33 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] selftests: fix build errors on alpine linux Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 9:34 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-08-14 12:44 ` Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 12:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 6:34 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] selftests: run tests on nommu architecture Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 12:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-13 6:34 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] selftests/mm: add nommu mmap and mremap behavior tests Hajime Tazaki
2026-08-14 13:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-14 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] fix nommu mmap and add nommu kselftests Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-14 11:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=an7eC0oBvfjB6g54@pedro-suse.lan \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@thingy.jp \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=thehajime@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.