From: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, andrii@kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net,
eddyz87@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kuba@kernel.org, liamwisehart@meta.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
sdf.kernel@gmail.com, ameryhung@gmail.com, kuniyu@google.com,
memxor@gmail.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, sdf@fomichev.me,
martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/5] selftests/bpf: Add ksock kfunc test
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:59:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an9JfnuGUFifuQGB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0f93b51174ba64b1ce220ea0ef67b1eced238efdd66ed4a5960f3b2966a70e9@mail.kernel.org>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 12:13:34PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..05d7b7424aee3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Isovalent */
> > +
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +
> > +#include "test_progs.h"
> > +#include "network_helpers.h"
> > +#include "ksock_lsm.skel.h"
> > +
> > +#define NS_TEST "ksock_lsm_ns"
> > +#define RECV_PORT 7777
> > +#define RECV_TIMEOUT_SEC 5
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +static bool ksock_test_env_setup(struct ksock_test_env *env)
> > +{
> > + struct sockaddr_in addr = {
> > + .sin_family = AF_INET,
> > + .sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK),
> > + .sin_port = htons(RECV_PORT),
> > + };
> > + struct timeval tv = { .tv_sec = RECV_TIMEOUT_SEC };
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + memset(env, 0, sizeof(*env));
> > + env->rfd = -1;
> > +
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(make_netns(NS_TEST), "make_netns"))
> > + goto fail;
> > +
> > + env->nstoken = open_netns(NS_TEST);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(env->nstoken, "open_netns"))
> > + goto fail;
> > +
> > + env->rfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(env->rfd, "receiver socket"))
> > + goto fail;
> > +
> > + err = bind(env->rfd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bind receiver"))
> > + goto fail;
> > +
> > + err = setsockopt(env->rfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof(tv));
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "set rcvtimeo"))
> > + goto fail;
>
> A subsystem pattern flags this socket setup sequence as potentially
> worth simplifying. The network_helpers.h header already provides
> start_server(family, type, addr, port, timeout_ms) which performs
> socket() + bind() + settimeo() for SOCK_DGRAM.
>
> Other SOCK_DGRAM tests in prog_tests/ use start_server() for this:
> cg_storage_multi.c, connect_force_port.c, cgroup_getset_retval.c,
> sock_destroy.c, and tc_redirect.c. Could this be written as:
>
> env->rfd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, "127.0.0.1",
> RECV_PORT, RECV_TIMEOUT_SEC * 1000);
>
> to drop the addr and tv locals and use the shared error logging?
>
> That said, there is also precedent for the hand-rolled form in the same
> directory (cgroup_storage.c, udp_limit.c, xdp_metadata.c, and others),
> so this may just be a style choice.
Yeah unsure it's worth simplifying.
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/31694719067
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 11:05 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/5] Introduce bpf_ksock Mahe Tardy
2026-08-13 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] net: Add connect_socket() helper Mahe Tardy
2026-08-13 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/5] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs Mahe Tardy
2026-08-13 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/5] selftests/bpf: Add ksock kfunc test Mahe Tardy
2026-08-13 12:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 16:59 ` Mahe Tardy [this message]
2026-08-13 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/5] selftests/bpf: Test forbidden bpf_ksock_send() LSM attach Mahe Tardy
2026-08-13 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add ksock test for async callback guard Mahe Tardy
2026-08-13 12:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 17:02 ` Mahe Tardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=an9JfnuGUFifuQGB@gmail.com \
--to=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=liamwisehart@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.