All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] tools/mm: make gup_bench a benchmark only tool
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:31:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anGxaETOA4a5auZC@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53e2202d-15df-4788-a6aa-1f345f0a5395@arm.com>

Hi Sarthak,

On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:04:13PM +0530, Sarthak Sharma wrote:
> Hi Mike!
> 
> On 8/3/26 2:30 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >  
> > And the limit checks seem wierd all over the place, like if we can loop
> > infinitely, why do we care about INT_MAX?
> 
> INT_MAX checks are there since nr_pages, nthreads and repeats are stored
> as int.
> 
> But yes I can keep the parameters which are not there in the ioctl ABI
> to be unsigned long, so these checks won't be required there.
> > 
> > And what exact limit ULONG_MAX / MB or SIZE_MAX / sizeof(ptread_t) are
> > supposed to express?
> 
> ULONG_MAX / MB prevents size *= MB from overflowing. SIZE_MAX /
> sizeof(ptread_t) prevents thread array allocation size from overflowing.

To me these checks seem overprotective from one side and not actually
serving a real purpose from the other.

Like e.g. requesting INT_MAX - 1 pages passes the check but it means almost 8TB
of memory and that's really wild.

I'd say let's keep things simple and if a user is stupid enough to run this
with peculiar command line just let it crash.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 14:08 [PATCH v6 0/6] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] selftests/mm: make file helpers return errors Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  6:39     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] tools/lib/mm: add shared file helpers Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  6:43     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04  9:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] tools/lib/mm: move hugepage_settings out of selftests Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-03 12:44     ` Mark Brown
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] tools/mm: move gup_test from selftests/mm to tools/mm Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] tools/mm: make gup_bench a benchmark only tool Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  7:34     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04  9:31       ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] selftests/mm: add a GUP selftest Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  7:38     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04  9:35       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-03  9:00 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  6:36   ` Sarthak Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anGxaETOA4a5auZC@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sarthak.sharma@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.