From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C60F308F32 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 21:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785880008; cv=none; b=EGb4oiQJma23jqAO5IGj2lPfrEAoZc6VeYC2uCjrPw9flQm8wF9JInbyT974ToKMvc7rjD2NZDNOsWkIQIHC9I0f4P98dXAkk0mP9QK1ILykFa90YHoxIIvWJ7VAZjR0djEnVbsj/VhV9uPPNjuDmAt9AR1Iy5+XOoXB89f6oHE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785880008; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DV/K8A8Z9ww1NM5OljOuV8+9qH8v10i4Gd/SqxxxMXw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=X9iRG8SwwS2QRz4vnLgcns/NpKNIhg55FVgQ9eB+02uZYe6bt/57sqf5zwjZti94wPNzAsdNBExHkrFfFkZMyycOsgz/U1lMn2fCJ+1rJlhXib4/jKd2mjuAUuNRDlkP5qLzaDcthT/2KPrnWyN6i7ZhcQao7oFgHXlMH4bVAGg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=dVCOk7Gu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="dVCOk7Gu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1785879998; bh=DV/K8A8Z9ww1NM5OljOuV8+9qH8v10i4Gd/SqxxxMXw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=dVCOk7GuXoMMUM1ptiBCYY8Qrci8Q2NajdXpYJ20t+XKz7PAjgEwPaNU7Fxvkmba/ L9GQ2gpwCHQ5e5lqvdmT9819X4xu5GH+CHboO2cix1pTKcgfJgvWNkJ0qbjGwylop2 QC0oH5Q0Wf8fg1c2pnCqCHdL2F4beWmFAjvwSQ3g0FJld5NxDhvfJffXGPITEwKZD4 U7WlpMV4pg8akrGxsiLoZZoadgANgGkh4p9OaBKWcbYspl3MGGrqs3C9uIbgBanUlw Ox/FTlTr6Ws1eBosKzIVp9I9L8WFvTu1aycsK0nhJdkrkuICQjS/qHr3RVEkoTurYs 3hBLT9VGjpW3A0t3GxKcEDY36R9g/hDvX0YVtqCpj+AXlxlR0INNkYRHPqv37DuFAq empcsvkGct8OABSU/ExmLJbUMwdKXRJXAziCOa+DlsskVTThVq8aScFQY77sRRCtmq 5iRSfuUll2uzVGfposOqEG7YYTkyuwxdJLp91SVkIIn7pSPXCX6 Received: from fruit.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2c0:f00f:f901:c925:10f2:5963:c20e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FBB520112; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 21:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 21:46:37 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] hex: allow only lowercase object IDs in breaking changes mode Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org References: <20260729233215.398654-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20260729233215.398654-7-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xmFW2lwfKe2Avdms" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.1 (2026-07-04) --xmFW2lwfKe2Avdms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2026-08-04 at 19:32:18, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Will queue, but I invite others to chime in. My practical side says > we should just take the series as it is much less work for us to > declare that any incompatibility fallout is the problem of other > people who have reimplementations of Git, but my more principled > side feels dirty, just for saying this ;-). I appreciate that, and I do welcome other viewpoints here. While I think this series a good idea (or I wouldn't have sent it, obviously), it's really up to the project what the right thing is and if the consensus is that this should be dropped, then we can do that. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA --xmFW2lwfKe2Avdms Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wr0EABYKAG8FgmpyXbwJEHwMSWKIh6KBRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ7Xo6OVgAZHFvZeSywWHERR08UTCLqGPpJWzumd0pzkW FiEECCzmip28ZfuD0cORfAxJYoiHooEAAKXiAP4rUFk98x775GLNH0j8Jo1xI21h SZnQhDJTBoRgnfNMYgEAgYaJwtZdgcUfHAGZ21jP18jE+BVy8eUTIiUzNFKNOAM= =qLlO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xmFW2lwfKe2Avdms--