From: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/17] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 16:14:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anJyTS_3sr9Oh7ZL@tardis.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3513cd3b-5b6a-4a3a-bf56-79bbd40b3bec@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 02:39:20AM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
> > index 33fc4c814a9f..8299657f0f86 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/preempt.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
> > @@ -34,14 +34,31 @@
> > * SOFTIRQ_MASK: 0x0000ff00
> > * HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK: 0x00ff0000
> > * HARDIRQ_MASK: 0x0f000000
> > + *
> > + * When HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS=y, PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED is put in a
> > + * separate word and that allows 64bit load-store architectures to 'set'
> > + * PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED without messing up the otherwise symmetric
> > + * modifications used on preempt_count and still load the whole thing
> > + * (single-copy) atomically, without having to resort to full atomic
> > + * operations.
> > + *
> > + * Because of the above, NMI_MASK bits are different depending on
> > + * HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS:
> > + *
> > + * - HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS=n:
> > + *
> > * NMI_MASK: 0x10000000
> > * PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED: 0x80000000
> > + *
> > + * - HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS=y:
> > + * NMI_MASK: 0xf0000000
> > + * (PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED is in a different word)
> > */
> > #define PREEMPT_BITS 8
> > #define SOFTIRQ_BITS 8
> > #define HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS 8
> > #define HARDIRQ_BITS 4
> > -#define NMI_BITS 1
> > +#define NMI_BITS (1 + 3*IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS))
>
>
> Shouldn't testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h also be updated with
> same?
>
Yeah, sashiko found out the same thing.
>
> > #define PREEMPT_SHIFT 0
> > #define SOFTIRQ_SHIFT (PREEMPT_SHIFT + PREEMPT_BITS)
> > @@ -116,8 +133,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned char interrupt_context_level(void)
> > * preempt_count() is commonly implemented with READ_ONCE().
> > */
> > -#define nmi_count() (preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
> > -#define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK)
> > +#define nmi_count() (preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
> > +#define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> > # define softirq_count() (current->softirq_disable_cnt & SOFTIRQ_MASK)
> > # define irq_count() ((preempt_count() & (NMI_MASK | HARDIRQ_MASK)) | softirq_count())
> > diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> > index 88c594c6d7fc..35f546a042b1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> > +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> > @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ config PREEMPT_RT_NEEDS_BH_LOCK
> > config PREEMPT_COUNT
> > bool
> > +config HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
> > + bool
> > + depends on PREEMPT_COUNT && 64BIT
> > +
> > config PREEMPTION
> > bool
> > select PREEMPT_COUNT
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 9b3f1764fa9e..6d88343c3bad 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -5973,8 +5973,13 @@ void preempt_count_add(int val)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> > /*
> > * Underflow?
> > + *
> > + * Cannot detect underflow based on the current preempt_count() value
> > + * if using HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS because preempt count takes all 32
> > + * bits.
> > */
> > - if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON((preempt_count() < 0)))
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS) &&
> > + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON((preempt_count() < 0)))
> > return;
> > #endif
> > __preempt_count_add(val);
> > @@ -6006,7 +6011,10 @@ void preempt_count_sub(int val)
> > /*
> > * Underflow?
> > */
> > - if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count()))
> > + unsigned int uval = val;
> > + unsigned int pc = preempt_count();
> > +
> > + if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(pc - uval > pc))
> > return;
> > /*
> > * Is the spinlock portion underflowing?
> > diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> > index 0c9b2269a8d6..7980a4a232f9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> > +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> > @@ -103,7 +103,13 @@ void _local_interrupt_enable(void)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(_local_interrupt_enable);
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
> > +/*
> > + * Any 32bit architecture that still cares about performance should
> > + * probably ensure this is near preempt_count.
> > + */
> > DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nmi_nesting);
> > +#endif
> > /*
> > * SOFTIRQ_OFFSET usage:
> > diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
> > index bfafe1204c7b..c3d976c801bb 100644
> > --- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
> > +++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
> > @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ static int unexpected_testcase_failures;
> > static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected, int lockclass_mask)
> > {
> > - int saved_preempt_count = preempt_count();
> > + long saved_preempt_count = preempt_count();
>
> nit: Isn't preempt_count still returns int?
>
Right, let me fix that. Thank you!
Regards,
Boqun
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> > int saved_mgd_count = current->migration_disabled;
> > int saved_rcu_count = current->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 16:14 [PATCH v4 00/17] Refcounted interrupt disable and SpinLockIrq for Rust Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Joel Fernandes
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 6:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 6:59 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub,add}_return() Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Lyude Paul
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 18:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 18:26 ` [PATCH v4.1 " Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-10 8:57 ` [tip: locking/core] irq,spin_lock: " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] irq & spin_lock: " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 21:08 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 6:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 7:07 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 7:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 7:19 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 13:53 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 14:10 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 14:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 14:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 15:11 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 16:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 17:38 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 18:07 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Lyude Paul
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Lyude Paul
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] sched: Remove the unused preempt_offset parameter of __cant_sleep() Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] sched: Avoid signed comparison of preempt_count() in __cant_migrate() Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 6:54 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 7:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 7:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-06 0:58 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 21:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 23:14 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] arm64: sched/preempt: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] s390/preempt: " Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 12:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-08 20:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Heiko Carstens
2026-08-10 8:57 ` tip-bot2 for Heiko Carstens
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] rust: Introduce interrupt module Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] rust: sync: Use super::* in spinlock.rs Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] rust: sync: Introduce SpinLockIrq::lock_with() and friends Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anJyTS_3sr9Oh7ZL@tardis.local \
--to=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.