All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org,
	grayhat@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 23:39:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anOok9XvLMNX_Aqu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ecgdaupe.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I'd rather keep it on the VM creation path. This is VM-wide data, by
> definition, and given that its size doesn't depend on the number of
> vcpus anymore (we allocate the maximum once and for all), it is right
> where it belongs. See the untested hack below for the freeing on error.

I'll send a v2 with this soon.

> 
> > There's another issue in the current code: the ptdump debugfs file
> > keeps the raw mmu pointer as its private data. I would add that to the
> > commit message.
> 
> Why is that a problem? With this approach, the mmu pointers are always
> expected to be valid, irrespective of the allocation pattern, and we
> only publish pointers to the dumper when the S2_mmu is actively being
> used.
> 

Sorry I was talking about the old implementation. Array reallocation
leaves ptdump i_private pointers dangling.

I'm dropping the selftest for v2. It was a useful KASAN trigger, but is 
not a good fit for the current suite.

Thanks,
Karl


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 22:44 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-03 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a nested S2 MMU realloc test Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-04 14:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-04 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 14:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 21:54     ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-05  7:32       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-05 21:39         ` Karl Mehltretter [this message]
2026-08-07 17:08   ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-09 11:39     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anOok9XvLMNX_Aqu@gmail.com \
    --to=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=grayhat@foxmail.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.