From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A72C5AC7C for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:57:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yMIVy2ItWRFvD45EUIpDt5YpgZE+XNn0OkWyXbr7zqc=; b=x+Os/8Lz+iiP66 wEsPxcOErAVg0hFudb86doGwu2S6TPfl53H/49ZpmsQpF29kigrH6ydv/xlty4sMUyVPWk6A3LtBu C6Gd8I5d6MkBP/rjmXAyHKlL9MgZHZu+lEinOG0BXafGoJzCPkc1Ge57XdhKQZsM9WoDGwCobifNI H+bHVy9O5EJq1VIDTVzBjcifIykxFLTqenbREus40kM5Bk3HfIXH2egfZptyv2Buj5rA6/UsnOm+Q EtujmY+aJREOVqGiaKP0BG1BYE2sD9/M+8pXOprFp+FYzVG6v0Q2OsUUck3XGJw5NmtVNJPVIePiG 1Qw484eTnoc/oOT+HZBw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ws0Sp-000000069LU-0QuJ; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:56:59 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ws0So-000000069KN-0i2Y; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:56:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CB360AB9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372BF1F000E9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786031817; bh=pjRHKsliqvvLYwqfQ+GA2Px/s3f/hlLeRUQ/A/a3Vhc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=aM8CzvZL1kM8bogCR4THoedGsE0LsrmHOW+9scLTFef8/T7iNfbQbqgwneQlJrmVb zwDA/h8baSVPt2RNqX39wKuflTMuCV7OidrA01gdihp3LswRdZ7e+J5VEwE/nNb32j B5uTIT+0mN7qqbN+Sg5xFSbj/4/5/UpX8PJQmbiID9wudtYkOuu71mfSYwjGdKy508 r3gSTDHRJgOkLV1tKT5/fE6Dy1EeShHego3b067oJpOC1sph9rk9odxLj2/cTaWJye +PK4PYBpH9fbPU7d0IkzyCPiCRWtpDcphDgFnF1qfCmWTBVy7uwOMJXI+NIMpixzBY 6DZ7QBk91fWrw== Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 21:26:53 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Michael Riesch Cc: jason98166@gmail.com, Neil Armstrong , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Guochun Huang , Philipp Zabel , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy: support per-direction phys Message-ID: References: <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-0-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-1-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 03-08-26, 13:17, Michael Riesch wrote: > > + Two cells select the PHY type and the direction, so that the > > + transmitter (DSI) and the receiver (CSI) can be described as > > + independent consumers of the same PHY: > > + - > > + - > > How is that Rockchip specific? As you state above this is either MIPI > CSI or MIPI DSI, two perfectly standard protocols. > > @all Would it be reasonable to introduce PHY_TYPE_CSI and PHY_TYPE_DSI? I think yes... -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A41C56205 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0Rmu8OAvVVUx1Ddnz315jEAHzE/5DiwWSSlAmYimmFU=; b=kRdvphCpECBHAj jMWKxa+K0Q5eL0k3QsKeHH/MVSGDxDc+ej412xSvS+Us+4lFkGlbpKNoV4kl8Oye8MCR6LRgpDn0O jTu3K5qeO/alYzG8eDDBafa0qESn3D4zSpWZiMZgaEea01gH6u6ihWEkXvzF2iZBTm3uCcdutbf3X Z6bUSQah0QWARwiP1XTu/icrEtLF74OkFKQ3G8mMUdy8YSqDztfY8a9Wt717cDUHGBr1Sj7kUrw8r wFs757KmY4V/xFEfXqXAuT0LtNaJ8jz5YrX3Z2Rj0Q/lNzFunLiT7u73RL5hjbn99TMyUWAmT4XDV zt2MsYBDCro2YYtEkSDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ws0Sp-000000069LL-0BXC; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:56:59 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ws0So-000000069KN-0i2Y; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:56:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CB360AB9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372BF1F000E9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786031817; bh=pjRHKsliqvvLYwqfQ+GA2Px/s3f/hlLeRUQ/A/a3Vhc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=aM8CzvZL1kM8bogCR4THoedGsE0LsrmHOW+9scLTFef8/T7iNfbQbqgwneQlJrmVb zwDA/h8baSVPt2RNqX39wKuflTMuCV7OidrA01gdihp3LswRdZ7e+J5VEwE/nNb32j B5uTIT+0mN7qqbN+Sg5xFSbj/4/5/UpX8PJQmbiID9wudtYkOuu71mfSYwjGdKy508 r3gSTDHRJgOkLV1tKT5/fE6Dy1EeShHego3b067oJpOC1sph9rk9odxLj2/cTaWJye +PK4PYBpH9fbPU7d0IkzyCPiCRWtpDcphDgFnF1qfCmWTBVy7uwOMJXI+NIMpixzBY 6DZ7QBk91fWrw== Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 21:26:53 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Michael Riesch Cc: jason98166@gmail.com, Neil Armstrong , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Guochun Huang , Philipp Zabel , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy: support per-direction phys Message-ID: References: <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-0-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-1-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 03-08-26, 13:17, Michael Riesch wrote: > > + Two cells select the PHY type and the direction, so that the > > + transmitter (DSI) and the receiver (CSI) can be described as > > + independent consumers of the same PHY: > > + - > > + - > > How is that Rockchip specific? As you state above this is either MIPI > CSI or MIPI DSI, two perfectly standard protocols. > > @all Would it be reasonable to introduce PHY_TYPE_CSI and PHY_TYPE_DSI? I think yes... -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B2C5C56205 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:57:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=pjRHKsliqvvLYwqfQ+GA2Px/s3f/hlLeRUQ/A/a3Vhc=; b=ZVKsZiRuLP8bqHWPlvBHukmOvk DM3Drc6iNPWh0z9vMUeNXvJpjGlFwvmjBWyrXjCP5q2smb9/pDQpmAXtc1uzdyGQiPO0HlU2sufa7 x1j/iO1CSCGVt1zScI4juImHkyX6/+SmG/gbL0LExfOc3DkuvPWsEJ2AJwiN0ZBuFIKv73h2+nxg0 HjO4HFNyCFyj37mJW2S/IXw4NpGY+Ph1F7hG5wJV1lKu5NU+FfLoJd7nXmWGOos+08+E5QfXmEuey 9Fqjn1RgtghYU75WjIMc8DU0tJJbwH4jvFr6+BvfPdocH7/EnDIXsKnPXaWe/3SCJgB6kkZVTM6bl MVQ9iitQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ws0So-000000069L2-3zij; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:56:58 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ws0So-000000069KN-0i2Y; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:56:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CB360AB9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372BF1F000E9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786031817; bh=pjRHKsliqvvLYwqfQ+GA2Px/s3f/hlLeRUQ/A/a3Vhc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=aM8CzvZL1kM8bogCR4THoedGsE0LsrmHOW+9scLTFef8/T7iNfbQbqgwneQlJrmVb zwDA/h8baSVPt2RNqX39wKuflTMuCV7OidrA01gdihp3LswRdZ7e+J5VEwE/nNb32j B5uTIT+0mN7qqbN+Sg5xFSbj/4/5/UpX8PJQmbiID9wudtYkOuu71mfSYwjGdKy508 r3gSTDHRJgOkLV1tKT5/fE6Dy1EeShHego3b067oJpOC1sph9rk9odxLj2/cTaWJye +PK4PYBpH9fbPU7d0IkzyCPiCRWtpDcphDgFnF1qfCmWTBVy7uwOMJXI+NIMpixzBY 6DZ7QBk91fWrw== Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 21:26:53 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Michael Riesch Cc: jason98166@gmail.com, Neil Armstrong , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Guochun Huang , Philipp Zabel , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy: support per-direction phys Message-ID: References: <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-0-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-1-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 03-08-26, 13:17, Michael Riesch wrote: > > + Two cells select the PHY type and the direction, so that the > > + transmitter (DSI) and the receiver (CSI) can be described as > > + independent consumers of the same PHY: > > + - > > + - > > How is that Rockchip specific? As you state above this is either MIPI > CSI or MIPI DSI, two perfectly standard protocols. > > @all Would it be reasonable to introduce PHY_TYPE_CSI and PHY_TYPE_DSI? I think yes... -- ~Vinod