All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: vova tokarev <vladimirelitokarev@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, security@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: BadBunny: UFFDIO_COPY shmem killpriv bypass leading to local privilege escalation
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 13:17:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ancYCBUT8aB0qHwz@pedro-suse.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGBKPgOfbMJruqcegJca6BBpEtpd91s5ASF_VU+gucWsjwp8WA@mail.gmail.com>

I'm adding a bunch of fs people that might have opinions about this. Please
see the rest of the thread below.

On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 12:13:06PM +0300, vova tokarev wrote:
> Pedro,
> 
> Thanks for the review. Let me address both points.
> 
> On the page fault comparison:
> 
> UFFDIO_COPY is not comparable to a page fault. Page faults serve
> existing page cache content (read-like). UFFDIO_COPY adds new,

A page fault can also write to the page cache. On MAP_SHARED mappings.

> 
> user-controlled content to the shmem page cache (write-like).
> 
> The correct comparison is to write(), which calls file_modified()
> 
> -> __remove_privs() to strip SUID/SGID.
> 
> 
> This is exactly the reasoning used when fallocate() was fixed
> 
> across XFS (commit fbe7e5200365), ext4, and f2fs to call
> 
> file_modified(). The XFS commit message says:
> 
> "as various fallocate modes can change the file contents [...]
> 
> we should drop file privileges like suid just like we do for a
> 
> regular write()"

I can't speak for fallocate, or other system calls. As far as I'm aware,
this is a best-effort kind of thing. As I said, writing to a MAP_SHARED
mapping does not clear the setuid bit. It's a super trivial thing to do,
too. But it's not a problem because setuid executables are not world-writable.

I simply don't think this can feasibly be a security boundary, considering
how much it has been historically screwed up, and how the second-most basic
way to write to a file Just Bypasses It. I also don't know a single setuid
program that's packaged as 04777. Do you?

> 
> UFFDIO_COPY on shmem changes file contents.
> 
> It should drop file privileges like suid, just like write().
> 
> 
> On the PoC setup and exploitability:
> 
> The PoC uses mode 04777 for simplicity of demonstration,
> 
> but the underlying bug is a killpriv invariant violation:
> 
> every VFS write path calls file_modified() to strip SUID on
> 
> content modification, but shmem_mfill_filemap_add() does not.
> 
> The killpriv mechanism is defense-in-depth - if file permissions
> 
> alone were sufficient to protect SUID, the kernel wouldn't bother
> 
> stripping SUID on write(). But it does, because writable SUID files
> 
>  do occur in practice (group-writable SUID binaries, POSIX ACLs,
> 
>  container shared mounts, chained with a separate write-access bug).
> 
> 
> For precedent: CVE-2023-0386 (overlayfs copy-up preserving SUID
> 
>  across namespaces) is the same class of bug - a kernel code path
> 
>  that modifies or copies file content without stripping SUID -
> 
> and was scored CVSS 7.8 and added to CISA's KEV catalog.
> 
> The fallocate killpriv fixes were backported to all stable trees.
> 
> 
> Additionally, this path is available even with
> 
> vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd=0, since UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY
> 
> bypasses the privilege check (userfaultfd_syscall_allowed()
> 
> returns true unconditionally for USER_MODE_ONLY).
> 
> The kernel considers this path safe for unprivileged use,
> 
> yet it skips killpriv.
> 
> 
> *On the fix:*
> 
> Regardless of how we classify severity, the fix is trivial and makes
> 
> UFFDIO_COPY consistent with every other write path -
> 
> add file_modified() to shmem_mfill_filemap_add().
> 
> I'm happy to submit a patch if you'd like.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Vladimir
> 
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 5:14 PM Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 01:40:41PM +0300, vova tokarev wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It's been almost two months since I sent this report, and I haven't
> > > heard back. I'd really appreciate any feedback when you get a chance.
> > >
> > > I've rechecked both mainline master and stable 6.12.95 -- the
> > > vulnerability remains unfixed in both trees:
> > >
> > > 1. mm/shmem.c: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() (6.12) /
> > shmem_mfill_filemap_add()
> > >    (7.x) still adds pages to the page cache without calling
> > file_modified()
> > >    or __remove_privs(). Writing to a SUID binary on tmpfs via UFFDIO_COPY
> > >    preserves the setuid bit.
> > >
> > > 2. mm/userfaultfd.c: I noticed commit 85668fda932a added retry state
> > >    tracking on master, but MFILL_RETRY_STATE_VMA_FLAGS still does not
> > >    include VMA_WRITE_BIT -- the mprotect TOCTOU remains exploitable.
> > >
> > > This is a deterministic local privilege escalation (no race timing
> > > needed for the killpriv bypass), affects every kernel since 4.11
> > > (8+ years), and works on any system with userfaultfd + tmpfs (the
> > > default on virtually all distributions).
> > >
> > > I have a full working PoC that gets uid=0 from uid=1000 reliably.
> > > Happy to provide any additional information if needed.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vladimir
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > From: vova tokarev <vladimirelitokarev@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:37 PM
> > > Subject: BadBunny: UFFDIO_COPY shmem killpriv bypass leading to local
> > > privilege escalation
> > > To: <security@kernel.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a local privilege escalation (BadBunny) in the userfaultfd +
> > > shmem subsystems that affects all Linux kernels from 4.11 to 7.1
> > > (every major distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, Arch,
> > > Android, ChromeOS, and any system with CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y and a
> > > tmpfs/shmem mount).
> > >
> > > Two bugs are chained:
> > >
> > > 1. TOCTOU in UFFDIO_COPY retry path (mm/userfaultfd.c):
> > >    mfill_retry_state_changed() does not re-validate VM_WRITE after
> > >    dropping and re-acquiring the mmap lock in mfill_copy_folio_retry().
> > >    A concurrent mprotect(PROT_READ) installs a writable PTE into a
> > >    now-read-only VMA.
> >
> > This sounds like a bug, but not really exploitable.
> >
> > >
> > > 2. Missing killpriv in shmem UFFDIO_COPY (mm/shmem.c):
> > >    shmem_mfill_filemap_add() adds pages to the shmem page cache
> > >    without calling file_modified()/killpriv. This preserves SUID/SGID
> > >    bits when file content is replaced via UFFDIO_COPY, unlike normal
> > >    write() which strips them.
> > >
> > > NOTE: The killpriv bypass (Bug 2) does not require
> > > unprivileged userfaultfd and works even with
> > vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd=0,
> > > since UFFDIO_COPY on shmem is available to any process that can open
> > > a tmpfs file O_RDWR and call userfaultfd with UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY.
> >
> > Who made the suid file world-writable? Note that this is not a bug, page
> > fault paths don't clear the suid bit either.
> >
> > >
> > > An unprivileged user can replace the content of a SUID-root binary on
> > > tmpfs via UFFDIO_COPY while preserving its setuid permission, then
> > > execute it to obtain root.
> > >
> > > The attack is deterministic (no timing dependency for the killpriv
> > > bypass), requires no heap spraying, and bypasses all modern kernel
> > > mitigations (KASLR, SMEP, SMAP, CFI, PAC, heap hardening).
> > >
> > > Affected versions: Linux 4.11+ (since shmem UFFDIO_COPY support,
> > >     commit 4c27fe4c4c84 "userfaultfd: shmem: add shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte")
> >
> > This sounds like a bug, but not really exploitable.
> > > Confirmed on: 7.1.0 (aarch64)
> > > Affected distros: All major distributions (Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora,
> > >     RHEL, SUSE, Arch, Android, ChromeOS) that have CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y
> > >     and tmpfs mounted (virtually all Linux systems)
> > >
> > > Attached files:
> > >   - bad_bunny.c                           Full LPE exploit (uid=1000 to
> > > uid=0) Build: gcc -static -O2 -pthread
> > >   - suidhelper.c                            Standalone SUID payload
> > binary
> > > Build: gcc -static -O2
> > >   - uffdio_copy_lpe_report.md     Detailed writeup with root cause,
> > > reproduction steps, and suggested fix
> > >   - badbunny_demo.mp4             PoC demo clip
> > >
> > > The PoC (bad_bunny.c) sets up a SUID target on tmpfs, drops to
> >
> > Since the exploit isn't public, I assume you set up the tmpfs file as root
> > and world writable. This is not an LPE.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pedro
> >

-- 
Pedro


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-08 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAGBKPgOm8q-8_rwyRPEmSj8JXdh_GaK1Q8vpJ=j-+yA0SgcNQw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-08-07 10:40 ` Fwd: BadBunny: UFFDIO_COPY shmem killpriv bypass leading to local privilege escalation vova tokarev
2026-08-07 14:14   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-08  9:13     ` vova tokarev
2026-08-08 12:17       ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-08-10  4:05         ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-11  9:21           ` Christian Brauner
2026-08-11 11:16             ` vova tokarev
2026-08-11 15:56               ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-11 16:12               ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ancYCBUT8aB0qHwz@pedro-suse.lan \
    --to=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vladimirelitokarev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.