From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: report RCU-tasks quiescent states in shrink_lruvec()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:43:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anqnkZceNHyvbR5S@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810-rcu_task_shrink_lruvec-v1-1-4d9f7d5251cb@debian.org>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 02:57:36AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> I am seeing some rcu_tasks stalls in the Meta fleet during reclaim.
>
> INFO: rcu_tasks detected stalls on tasks:
> 0000000088620d09: .. nvcsw: 6735/6735 holdout: 1 idle_cpu: -1/8
> task:GlobalCPUThread state:R running task pid:2552016 tgid:2524552
> Call Trace:
> shrink_lruvec
> mem_cgroup_iter
> shrink_node
> do_try_to_free_pages
> try_to_free_pages
> __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof
> alloc_pages_noprof
> pte_alloc_one
> __pte_alloc
> handle_mm_fault
>
> Nothing promises direct reclaim returns in bounded time, and the scan
> loop in shrink_lruvec() only calls cond_resched(), which is a no-op on
> PREEMPTION kernels. Involuntary preemption is not a Tasks-RCU
> quiescent state, so the reclaiming task never reports one and becomes a
> holdout.
I still don't understand why cond_resched() is being treated as involuntary
preemption but that is orthogonal to this patch.
>
> Upgrade it to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), which reports a quiescent
> state even when cond_resched() does nothing.
>
> PS: This has been discussed in [1]
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/amdWVTs0WKOxguxP@gmail.com/ [1]
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 9:57 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: report RCU-tasks quiescent states in shrink_lruvec() Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 15:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-08-10 20:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-08-11 4:43 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-08-11 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-08-11 17:54 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-08-11 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anqnkZceNHyvbR5S@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.