Re: [PATCH 2/2] ci: bump ubuntu image version for static-analysis job

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 10:52:21AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > Taking a step back, I do have to wonder whether the Cocci files have
> > been adding any kind of value in the first place. I myself introduced
> > some of them in contexts where I made sweeping changes to our APIs, so
> > that any in-flight topics can be trivially adjusted via Coccinelle. But
> > I very much doubt that anyone ever used those to adapt their in-flight
> > patch series at all.
> >
> > So maybe we should just not do that anymore?
> 
> We still do catch when somebody writes "if (a == NULL)", no?

Yes! What I was trying to say is that we maybe shouldn't add Cocci files
for temporary migrations anymore, but still keep (and extend) them for
evertyhing where we want to consistently catch antipatterns going
forward.

Overall I have a feeling that I'm overthinking this though :) Maybe it
ultimately doesn't matter too much and we just continue what we're doing
and then clean up every once in a while when too much cruft has
accumulated.

Patrick