All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	ksummit@lists.linux.dev,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Any feedback for -next?
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:40:37 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anzMNXw9_mRL-8-_@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e805a87-73f2-4d8c-ad55-cab432bfe387@roeck-us.net>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 10:37:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 8/12/26 10:14, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 10:10:17AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 8/12/26 08:59, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2026, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 04:42:21 -0700
> > > > > Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 05:54:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > > Would getting rid of these ephemeral commits make linux-next easier
> > > > > > to work with?
> > 
> > > > > This has come up at the Maintainers Summit in the past. I believe it is
> > > > > even in the article I posted earlier in another thread.
> > 
> > > > >      https://lwn.net/Articles/1050027/
> > 
> > > > > We are even discussing issues about this in that other thread as well:
> > 
> > > > >     https://lore.kernel.org/all/0a8c1e90-1de1-4a76-b0fa-e367a4bd4f55@sirena.org.uk/
> > 
> > > > > I try to keep my linux-next branch clean, but I do rebase to add tags. I do
> > > > > on occasion remove commits if they prove to be totally broken. That's rare
> > > > > but I rather have that then having to push something to Linus where a bunch
> > > > > of commits are simply reverted.
> > 
> > > > +1
> > 
> > > > FWIW, I have always reserved the right to rebase in order to remove,
> > > > move around, reword and otherwise fix-up commits and do so often.  To
> > > > that end my 'next' branches are not, have ever been, nor do I intend
> > > > them to ever be, stable.

> > > Same here.

> > I do it as a last resort, but its better to avoid having bug+fix things
> > hitting upstream, i.e. trying to help with upstream bisectability.
> 
> That, but mostly adding tags.

I do add committer notes while merging patches, that I don't do using
git merge (shame on me), but then downstreamers don't hand me git repos
to pull from.

But in my case since documentation on how to use new features is
difficult to get and I don't want to make that a requirement (shame on
me), I end up testing the new feature with a before and after, recording
precise set of instructions on how to use it so that at least I can go
back and check how to test that feature if something looks wrong
aftwerwards.

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 16:54 [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Any feedback for -next? Mark Brown
2026-08-11 19:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-08-12 11:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-08-12 16:37   ` Mark Brown
2026-08-12 16:45     ` Sasha Levin
2026-08-12 17:02       ` Mark Brown
2026-08-12 11:42 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-12 15:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-12 15:59     ` Lee Jones
2026-08-12 17:10       ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-12 17:14         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-12 17:37           ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-12 19:40             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anzMNXw9_mRL-8-_@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.