From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7B0C61DBC for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876E410E8F0; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="B0XQpMjr"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3C010E8F0 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:41:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1787643693; x=1819179693; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pqrup3IFBPNsy52D6KGNlh2U2xD769wP546ycJAeeiw=; b=B0XQpMjrn8nXxbD2k5Z69JLP9yeSbZdKFFZeJQWNx28HbufOTx/UcbU0 bZLsiD5Wj2kU4KhA/o/TEa4DoG3m+xQaOh+2GjfhxIK3c/+tjv77Ihxpc 2s4SRWg1oOc10Pq7rRlI8hlQGHj4vUsvA4Ow8Xm+VusEMGX9AUx+NGPRV qLn2KMksSZpqchA34tNfpzyNikKKccet9vN4NsCZe//nVg4EEERooIa7P RobOnzZPWX1ysZt1IYofHFtxhUWY5wc+bPp5rJygCels4gPVqifGHDLv8 NLSsjnxWFLjPijBPCKrB0ybdiSE5Ejwd01qd8bVpUL/hv1ynnhDktWvQs Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZmoWuDyQT5CBjUZ992rUdQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vmqF38dnTJKarSmQH1mmdA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11885"; a="88306543" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,242,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="88306543" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2026 00:41:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dRyIzPsrS9azPB3OjlEZLg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gmfhvveFTiCbOKNVsb5U9w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,242,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="263479748" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2026 00:41:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:41:28 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: "Laguna, Lukasz" , sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/10] drm/xe: Introduce temporary device wedging Message-ID: References: <20260821112436.545405-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20260821112436.545405-9-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20260821113758.006681F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> <45efbcf8-b598-463e-b415-dfee2a3afe66@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 02:29:39PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 04:30:25PM +0200, Laguna, Lukasz wrote: > > On 8/21/2026 13:37, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: > > > - [Critical] Sleeping in atomic context due to `mutex_lock()` in `xe_device_declare_wedged()`. > > > > Already discussed, can be addressed in a follow-up series. > > Why can't this be addressed in this series? I believe this is worse then the > below case. But I really dislike that we are going further with the mutex > inside an atomic context only with a promise of fixing this later without > seeing the code... Because this is pre-existing issue and we don't sneak in fixes as part of unrelated features. They need to be sent separately so that they are easier to backport. Raag